Child Molestation Conviction Overturned after Twenty Years
On May 4, 2004, John Stoll of Bakersfield, California, was exonerated after serving twenty years for alleged child molestation. Stoll, two men, and a woman were accused of operating a sex ring involving sodomy, group sex, and pornography in 1984. The group was accused of sexually molesting six boys, ages six to eight. The children were never medically examined, and authorities did not find child pornography or any physical evidence to support the charges. During the trial the defense was not allowed to bring up the fact that the investigators asked the children leading and suggestive questions. In court the children gave conflicting testimony. Nonetheless, the defendants were convicted.
In dismissing the case against Stoll, Judge Lee P. Felice of the Superior Court of California (Kern County) stated that the investigators used manipulative questioning of the children, forcing them to give false testimony. Four of the six accusers, all adults in 2004, testified that the investigators' persistence during interviews caused them to recount false stories of molestation. A fifth witness indicated he could not remember the interviews. Stoll's son, six years old at the time he testified, still insisted his father molested him. Stoll claimed his ex-wife influenced the boy's testimony because of a bitter divorce. In the 1980s in Bakersfield, authorities prosecuted eight alleged sex rings, consisting of thirty people, for child molestation. Twenty-two convictions have since been overturned.
Suing Child Protective Services
In June 2000 the Washington Supreme Court, in Tyner v. the State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, CPS, ruled that CPS could be sued for negligent handling of investigations (No. 67602, Supreme Court of Washington). In 1993 David Tyner III was accused by his wife of sexually abusing their four-yearold daughter. The couple was in the process of a divorce. CPS did not uncover any abuse but continued to prohibit the father from seeing his children. Tyner sued CPS for mishandling the investigation. The court held that "CPS owes a duty of care to a child's parents, even those suspected of abusing their own children, when investigating allegations of child abuse." The court reinstated a jury verdict of more than $200,000 against the department.
Suing the Police
In September 2000 the Washington Supreme Court, in the first court ruling of its kind, unanimously ruled that the police can be held financially liable for negligence in child abuse investigations (Rodriguez v. City of Wenatchee, No. 69614-4, Supreme Court of Washington). The ruling stemmed from a lawsuit filed by Pastor Robert Roberson, his wife, and others accused of child molestation in Wenatchee, Washington. The Washington Supreme Court reinstated the $30 million lawsuit brought by the defendants.
The case started in 1994 when a nine-year-old foster child was placed in the home of Bob Perez, chief sexcrimes investigator of Wenatchee, Washington. The following year the girl told her foster father about being sexually abused by her parents. After the parents were convicted, the child made allegations of a sex ring involving the Robersons and forty-three adults since 1988. Based on the girl's testimony and that of her thirteen-yearold friend and a former member of Roberson's church, the pastor, his wife, and nineteen others were arrested on 27,726 counts of sexual abuse against sixty children. In December 1995 the Robersons were acquitted. In 1996 Perez's foster daughter recanted, denying her sexual abuse allegations and saying that Perez had pressured her. Her friend had also recanted her testimony.
On August 3, 2004, approximately ten years after the Wenatchee sexual abuse cases first surfaced, another civil lawsuit filed by those falsely accused reached the Court of Appeals of Washington. In Roberson v. Wenatchee (No. 21777-9-III), the appeals court unanimously upheld a lower court ruling, directing the city of Wenatchee to pay a fine of $718,000 for withholding information about investigator Robert Perez from persons who had sued the city after they were acquitted.
User Comments Add a comment…