FIGURE 5.7
other Western countries in the proportion of national electrical production generated by nuclear power. That is primarily because oil, natural gas, and coal have been more accessible in the United States than in other countries.
In 2002 the United States led the world in nuclear power generation with 780.1 billion kilowatt-hours, followed by France's 414.9 billion and Japan's 295.1 billion. (See Table 5.2.) These three countries together generated 58% of the world's nuclear electric power. France had by far the highest proportion (approximately 78%) of its electrical power produced by nuclear energy, followed by Belgium (59%), Sweden (46%), and Switzerland (41%). Japan produces 28% of its electricity by nuclear power generation, and the United States only 20%.
In its Information Digest 2004–2005, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission reported that as of December 31, 2003, there were 438 nuclear power plants in operation worldwide and fifty-four were under construction, on order, or had their construction halted, including eight in India, eight in South Korea, six in Russia, five in the Ukraine, five in Japan, and four in Romania.
Worldwide, the EIA projected in its International Energy Outlook 2004 that nuclear generating capacity will increase slightly overall, from 353 gigawatts in 2001 to 385 gigawatts in 2025. The increase will peak in 2015 with a generating capacity of 407 gigawatts. Totals for individual countries will increase for some and decrease for others. Some countries whose capacities are projected to increase from 2001 to 2025 are:
- Canada, from ten gigawatts in 2001, increasing to fifteen gigawatts in 2020, and decreasing to twelve gigawatts in 2025
TABLE 5.1
| Nuclear generating units, 1953–2003 | |||||||
| Year | Orders1 | Cancelled orders2 | Construction permits3 | Low-power operating licenses4 | Full-power operating licenses5 | Shutdowns6 | Operable units7 |
| 1Placement of an order by a utility or government agency for a nuclear steam supply system. | |||||||
| 2Cancellation by utilities of ordered units. Includes WNP 1; the licensee intends to request that the construction permit be cancelled. Does not include three units (Bellefonte 1 and 2 and Watts Bar 2) where construction has been stopped indefinitely. | |||||||
| 3Issuance by regulatory authority of a permit, or equivalent permission, to begin construction. Numbers reflect permits issued in a given year, not extant permits. | |||||||
| 4Issuance by regulatory authority of license, or equivalent permission, to conduct testing but not to operate at full power. | |||||||
| 5Issuance by regulatory authority of full-power operating license, or equivalent permission. Units generally did not begin immediate operation. | |||||||
| 6Ceased operation permanently. | |||||||
| 7Total of nuclear generating units holding full-power licenses, or equivalent permission to operate, at the end of the year. Although Browns Ferry 1 was shut down in 1985, the unit has remained fully licensed and thus has continued to be counted as operable during the shutdown; in May 2002, the Tennessee Valley Authority announced its intention to have the unit resume operation in 2007. | |||||||
| 8Under new regulations beginning in 1997, the terms "Low-power operating licenses" and "Full-power operating licenses" are no longer applicable; while no new licenses have been granted under the new regulations, applications were made in 2003 for three "Early site permits." | |||||||
| — = Not applicable. | |||||||
| Web Page: For related information, see http://www.eia.doe.gov/fuelnuclear.html. | |||||||
| SOURCE: "Table 9.1. Nuclear Generating Units, 1953–2003," in Annual Energy Review 2003, U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, September 7, 2004, http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/aer.pdf (accessed September 28, 2004) | |||||||
| 1953 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1954 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1955 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1956 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1957 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1958 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1959 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 1960 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 1961 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 1962 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| 1963 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| 1964 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 |
| 1965 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| 1966 | 20 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
| 1967 | 29 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 15 |
| 1968 | 16 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 |
| 1969 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 17 |
| 1970 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 20 |
| 1971 | 21 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 22 |
| 1972 | 38 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 27 |
| 1973 | 42 | 0 | 14 | 12 | 15 | 0 | 42 |
| 1974 | 28 | 9 | 23 | 14 | 15 | 2 | 55 |
| 1975 | 4 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 57 |
| 1976 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 63 |
| 1977 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 67 |
| 1978 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 70 |
| 1979 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 69 |
| 1980 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71 |
| 1981 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 75 |
| 1982 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 78 |
| 1983 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 81 |
| 1984 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 87 |
| 1985 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 96 |
| 1986 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 101 |
| 1987 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 107 |
| 1988 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 109 |
| 1989 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 111 |
| 1990 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 112 |
| 1991 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 111 |
| 1992 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 109 |
| 1993 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 110 |
| 1994 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 109 |
| 1995 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 109 |
| 1996 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 109 |
| 1997 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 08 | 08 | 2 | 107 |
| 1998 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 104 |
| 1999 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 104 |
| 2000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 104 |
| 2001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 104 |
| 2002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 104 |
| 2003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 104 |
| Total | 259 | 124 | 177 | 132 | 132 | 28 | — |
TABLE 5.2
| World net nuclear electric power generation, 1980, 1990, and 2002 | ||||||
| (Billion kilowatthours) | ||||||
| Nuclear electric power | Total | |||||
| Region and country | 1980 | 1990 | 2002P | 1980 | 1990 | 2002P |
| R = Revised. | ||||||
| P = Preliminary. | ||||||
| — = Not applicable. | ||||||
| (s) = Less than 0.05 billion kilowatthours. | ||||||
| Note: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding. | ||||||
| Web Page: For related information, see http://www.eia.doe.gov/international. | ||||||
| SOURCE: "Table 11.16. World Net Generation of Electricity by Type, 1980, 1990, and 2002 (Billion Kilowatthours)," in Annual Energy Review 2003, U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, September 7, 2004, http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/aer.pdf (accessed September 28, 2004) | ||||||
| North America | 287.0 | 648.9 | 860.3 | 2,721.6 | 3,623.9 | 4,592.7 |
| Canada | 35.9 | 69.2 | 71.0 | 367.9 | 468.6 | 548.9 |
| Mexico | 0.0 | 2.8 | 9.3 | 63.6 | 116.6 | 203.6 |
| United States | 251.1 | 576.9 | 780.1 | 2,289.6 | 3,038.0 | 3,839.3 |
| Other | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| Central and South America | 2.2 | 9.0 | 19.2 | 308.2 | R497.0 | 789.7 |
| Argentina | 2.2 | 7.0 | 5.4 | 41.8 | 48.3 | 81.4 |
| Brazil | 0.0 | 1.9 | 13.8 | 138.3 | 219.6 | 339.0 |
| Paraguay | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 27.0 | 48.4 |
| Venezuela | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 32.0 | 57.6 | 87.0 |
| Other | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 95.3 | R144.5 | 233.9 |
| Western Europe | 219.2 | 707.5 | 881.7 | 1,844.5 | 2,351.7 | 2,918.4 |
| Belgium | 11.9 | 40.6 | 45.0 | 50.8 | 66.5 | 76.6 |
| Finland | 6.6 | 18.3 | 21.2 | 38.7 | 51.8 | 71.6 |
| France | 63.4 | 298.4 | 414.9 | 250.8 | 397.6 | 528.6 |
| Germany | 55.6 | 145.1 | 156.8 | 469.9 | 526.0 | 548.3 |
| Italy | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 176.4 | 202.1 | 261.6 |
| Netherlands | 3.9 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 62.9 | 67.6 | 90.6 |
| Norway | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 82.9 | 120.4 | 125.9 |
| Spain | 5.2 | 51.6 | 59.9 | 109.2 | 143.9 | 229.0 |
| Sweden | 25.3 | 64.8 | 65.4 | 94.3 | 141.5 | 142.8 |
| Switzerland | 12.9 | 22.4 | 25.9 | 46.4 | 53.0 | 63.5 |
| Turkey | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 23.3 | 55.2 | 123.3 |
| United Kingdom | 32.3 | 58.7 | 83.6 | 265.1 | 295.2 | 360.8 |
| Other | 0.0 | 4.4 | 5.3 | 173.8 | 230.8 | 295.9 |
| Eastern Europe and former U.S.S.R | 83.2 | 251.3 | 297.1 | 1,604.1 | 1,976.6 | 1,619.9 |
| Czech Republic | — | — | 17.8 | — | — | 71.8 |
| Kazakhstan | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | 55.4 |
| Poland | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 114.7 | 128.5 | 133.8 |
| Romania | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.1 | 63.9 | 60.6 | 53.6 |
| Russia | — | — | 134.1 | — | — | 850.6 |
| Ukraine | — | — | 73.4 | — | — | 167.3 |
| Other | 83.2 | 251.3 | 66.7 | 1,425.6 | 1,787.5 | 287.4 |
| Middle East | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 92.4 | 228.9 | 490.0 |
| Iran | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21.3 | 55.9 | 129.0 |
| Saudi Arabia | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 20.5 | 64.9 | 138.2 |
| Other | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.7 | 108.1 | 222.8 |
| Africa | 0.0 | 8.4 | 12.0 | 189.2 | 307.5 | 453.9 |
| Egypt | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 18.3 | 41.4 | 81.3 |
| South Africa | 0.0 | 8.4 | 12.0 | 93.1 | 156.0 | 202.6 |
| Other | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 77.8 | 110.1 | 170.0 |
| Asia and Oceania | 92.7 | 279.9 | 489.3 | 1,280.5 | R2,354.7 | 4,425.9 |
| Australia | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 87.7 | 146.4 | 210.3 |
| China | 0.0 | 0.0 | 23.5 | 285.5 | 590.3 | 1,575.1 |
| India | 3.0 | 5.6 | 17.8 | 119.3 | 275.5 | 547.2 |
| Indonesia | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 46.5 | 99.3 |
| Japan | 78.6 | 192.2 | 295.1 | 549.1 | 822.1 | 1,044.0 |
| South Korea | 3.3 | 50.2 | 113.1 | 34.6 | 100.4 | 287.6 |
| Taiwan | 7.8 | 31.6 | 38.0 | 42.0 | 83.3 | 158.5 |
| Thailand | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.6 | 43.7 | 102.4 |
| Other | (s) | 0.4 | 1.8 | 135.3 | R246.4 | 401.4 |
| World | 684.4 | 1,905.0 | 2,559.6 | 8,040.5 | R11,340.2 | 15,290.5 |
- Japan, from forty-three gigawatts to fifty-seven gigawatts in 2020, and down to fifty-four gigawatts in 2025
- China, from two gigawatts in 2001 to twenty-one gigawatts in 2025
- India, from three to nine gigawatts
- United States, from ninety-eight to 103 gigawatts
- France, from sixty-three to seventy gigawatts
Some countries whose capacities are projected to decrease from 2001 to 2025 are:
- Germany, from twenty-one to zero gigawatts
- The United Kingdom, from twelve to four gigawatts
Some countries are planning to cut capacity radically or phase out nuclear power altogether. Sweden has legislated a nuclear phase-out by 2010 (although it is not clear that this is an attainable goal, since nearly half of Sweden's electricity comes from nuclear power). The Netherlands and Germany have strong conservation policies and well-organized antinuclear movements. The Netherlands is projected to phase out nuclear power by 2020 and Germany by 2025.
International Agreement on Safety
In September 1994 forty nations, including the United States, signed the International Convention on Nuclear Safety, an agreement that requires them to shut down nuclear power plants if necessary safety measures cannot be guaranteed. The agreement applies to land-based civil nuclear power plants and seeks to avert accidents like the 1986 explosion at Chernobyl in the former Soviet Union, the world's worst nuclear disaster to date. Ukraine, which inherited the Chernobyl plant after the collapse of the Soviet Union, signed the agreement. Signers must submit reports on atomic installations and, if necessary, make improvements to upgrade safety at the sites. Neighboring countries may call for an urgent study if they are concerned about a reactor's safety and the potential fallout that could affect their own population or crops.
User Comments Add a comment…