Library Index :: Gambling in America :: Casinos: Native American Tribal Casinos - History, Gambling Classes, Regulation, Federal Recognition, Revenues, Tribal-commercial Casino Ventures

Casinos: Native American Tribal Casinos - Tribal-commercial Casino Ventures

Casino building is very expensive. Those tribes that have built casinos have had to borrow large sums of money and/or obtain investors to do so. In general, for

TABLE 5.2

Tribal gaming revenues by revenue class (in thousands), 1999–2003
Gaming Revenue Range Number of operations Revenues (in thousands) Percentage of operations Revenues Mean (in thousands) Median (in thousands)
SOURCE: National Indian Gaming Commission Tribal Gaming Revenues, in NIGC Announces Indian Gaming Revenue for 2003, National Indian Gaming Commission, July 13, 2004, http://www.nigc.gov/nigc/documents/releases/pr_revenue_2003.jsp (accessed August 7, 2004)
Gaming operations with fiscal years ending in 2003
$100 million and over 43 10,714,581 13% 64% 249,176 184,332
$50 million to $100 million 35 2,459,698 11% 15% 70,277 65,416
$25 million to $50 million 55 1,984,673 17% 12% 36,085 37,029
$10 million to $25 million 67 1,144,779 20% 7% 17,086 16,894
$3 million to $10 million 57 350,398 17% 2% 6,147 5,819
Under $3 million 73 76,019 22% 0% 1,041 833
Total 330 16,730,148
Gaming operations with fiscal years ending in 2002
$100 million and over 41 9,510,660 12% 65% 231,967 179,101
$50 million to $100 million 24 1,694,606 7% 12% 70,609 65,577
$25 million to $50 million 55 1,978,519 16% 13% 35,976 38,984
$10 million to $25 million 65 1,067,513 19% 7% 16,423 16,570
$3 million to $10 million 63 386,399 18% 3% 6,133 5,373
Under $3 million 100 78,359 29% 1% 784 461
Total 348 14,716,056
Gaming operations with fiscal years ending in 2001
$100 million and over 39 8,398,523 12% 65% 215,347 158,836
$50 million to $100 million 19 1,415,755 6% 11% 74,513 79,083
$25 million to $50 million 43 1,528,611 13% 12% 35,549 34,264
$10 million to $25 million 58 997,546 18% 8% 17,199 16,328
$3 million to $10 million 57 385,654 17% 3% 6,766 7,292
Under $3 million 114 96,257 35% 1% 844 575
Total 330 12,822,346
Gaming operations with fiscal years ending in 2000
$100 million and over 31 6,606,284 10% 60% 213,106 141,684
$50 million to $100 million 24 1,693,510 8% 15% 70,563 73,314
$25 million to $50 million 41 1,360,777 13% 12% 33,190 29,944
$10 million to $25 million 50 856,464 16% 8% 17,129 17,335
$3 million to $10 million 55 350,110 18% 3% 6,366 6,250
Under $3 million 110 91,545 35% 1% 832 541
Total 311 10,958,690
Gaming operations with fiscal years ending in 1999
$100 million and over 28 5,845,787 9% 60% 208,778 136,897
$50 million to $100 million 19 1,323,995 6% 14% 69,684 70,412
$25 million to $50 million 33 1,193,049 11% 12% 36,153 35,990
$10 million to $25 million 59 1,028,834 19% 10% 17,438 17,562
$3 million to $10 million 54 322,268 17% 3% 5,968 5,764
Under $3 million 117 86,907 38% 1% 537 395
Total 310 9,800,840

Native American casinos, the law requires that tribes partner with companies for no more than five years and limits the companies' revenue to 30% of the total revenue. Under some circumstances, the partnership can last seven years and the companies' portion can be as much as 40% of total revenue.

At the end of 2003 the NIGC reported that forty-two gaming tribes had approved management contracts in place with commercial companies. Another eighteen potential contracts were under review at that time. One-third of the existing contracts are with gaming companies based in Las Vegas. Harrah's Entertainment is a partner in five of these contracts.

Tribal casinos have faced fierce opposition from commercial casino operators, who fear the competition. This is particularly true in California, where tribal casinos could cut deeply into Nevada casino revenues, as California's residents provide a large share of Nevada's gambling revenue. However, commercial casino companies see new opportunities for revenue gain through partnerships with Native American tribes. Some tribes have welcomed the investment capital and casino management experience offered by commercial partners. This is particularly true for small tribes.

For example, the Trump 29 Casino is a $60 million venture located in the Mojave Desert 130 miles southeast of Los Angeles, California. The casino, which opened in April 2002,

FIGURE 5.1

is owned by the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Luiseno Mission Indians, which has thirteen adult members. The casino is managed by Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts of Atlantic City, a commercial company owned by billionaire businessman Donald Trump. A tribal spokesperson said that the tribe selected the company for its name recognition appeal and for the management expertise it could bring to the casino.

In July 2002 the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians opened a $16 million casino in southern California near the Salton Sea. The tribe has only one adult member. The tribe teamed with the company Paragon Gaming of Las Vegas to develop the casino, which has several table games and about 350 slot machines.

Casino business ventures between companies and very small tribes are particularly controversial. Critics say that small tribes are being manipulated by outside investors who only want to cash in on tribal casinos. The California Nations Indian Gaming Association insists that small tribes should not be denied the tremendous economic opportunities offered by casinos. According to a spokesperson, "The reason some of these tribes have only one or two people left is because Indians were exterminated."

User Comments Add a comment…