Library Index :: Drug Reference - Narcotics, Depressants, Stimulants :: Drug Trafficking - Criminal Penalties For Trafficking, Is The Profit Worth The Risk?, Substantial World And U.s. Trade

Drug Trafficking - Cocaine

Price, Purity, and Supply

In its report entitled Illegal Drug Price and Purity Report (Washington, DC: DEA-02058, April 2003, http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/intel/02058/02058.html), the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) reached the conclusion that cocaine was readily available in the United States: "Cocaine prices at the kilogram level remained relatively low in the primary importation/distribution centers, such as Los Angeles, Miami, and New York City, as well as in most other major U.S. cities.… Cocaine prices nationwide have remained relatively stable over the time period [1998-2001], particularly for ounce and gram quantities, suggesting that cocaine was readily available to the user."

Price ranges going back to 1993 from a 2003 DEA report and from an earlier report by the National Narcotics Intelligence Consumers Committee (NNICC) are shown in Table 6.6. The data suggest that prices have been fairly stable, with a slight decline since 1993. In 1993, for instance, a kilogram (2.2 pounds) of cocaine went for $10,500 to $40,000 on average nationwide. In 2001 the average price was $10,000 to $36,000. Cocaine prices per gram were $20 to $200 nationwide in 2001 and lowest in New York where the price range was $20 to $30 per gram.

The U.S. government's policy of drug control is three-pronged: public education to prevent drug use before it happens; interdiction of supply is aimed at producers and distributors of drugs; and demand reduction is aimed at the user, employing law-enforcement on the one hand and treatment/rehabilitation on the other. If

TABLE 6.4
Worldwide illicit drug cultivation, 1996–2003
[In hectares]
SOURCE: "Worldwide Illicit Drug Cultivation, 1996-2003 (All Figures in Hectares)," in International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, 2003, U.S. Department of State, Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, March 1, 2004, http://www.state.gov/g/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2003/ (accessed February 15, 2005)

2003 2002 2001 2,000 1999 1998 1997 1996
Opium
Afghanistan 61,000 30,750 1,685 64,510 51,500 41,720 39,150 37,950
India 3,100
Iran
Pakistan 622 213 515 1,570 3,030 4,100 3,400
    Total SW Asia 61,000 31,372 1,898 65,025 53,070 44,750 45,300 44,450
Burma 47,130 78,000 105,000 108,700 89,500 130,300 155,150 163,100
China
Laos 18,900 23,200 22,000 23,150 21,800 26,100 28,150 25,250
Thailand 750 820 890 835 1,350 1,650 2,170
Vietnam 1,000 2,300 2,300 2,100 3,000 6,150 3,150
    Total SE Asia 66,030 102,950 130,120 135,040 114,235 160,750 191,100 193,670
Colombia 6,500 6,500 7,500 6,100 6,600 6,300
Lebanon
Guatemala
Mexico 2,700 4,400 1,900 3,600 5,500 4,000 5,100
    Total other 9,200 10,900 9,400 11,100 11,600 10,600 11,490
    Total opium 127,030 143,522 142,918 209,465 178,405 217,100 247,000 249,610
Coca
Bolivia* 28,450 24,400 19,900 14,600 21,800 38,000 45,800 48,100
Colombia 144,450 169,800 136,200 122,500 101,800 79,500 67,200
Peru 31,150 36,600 34,000 34,200 38,700 51,000 68,800 94,400
Ecuador
    Total coca 59,600 205,450 223,700 185,000 183,000 190,800 194,100 209,700
Cannabis
Mexico 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,700 4,600 4,800 6,500
Colombia 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Jamaica 527
    Total cannabis 5,000 8,900 8,900 8,900 8,700 9,600 10,117 12,027
*Beginning in 2001, U.S. government surveys of Bolivian coca take place over the period June to June.

interdiction was successful while heavy demand continued, prices would be expected to go up. If demand for the drugs decreased because people gave up their habits, prices would be expected to drop. Prices in 2001 continued a slight downturn, while at the same time 858,000 more people reported having used cocaine in the past year based on the National Survey conducted annually by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA). Since demand has not softened the steady or decreasing prices suggest increased supplies and/or decreased purities. Distributors, of course, can increase supplies by diluting the active ingredient.

Cocaine purity decreased from 1993 to 2001. (See Table 6.7.) At the kilogram level, purity was 82% in 1993 and had declined to 69% by 2001; at the ounce level the drop was from 70% to 53% and at the gram level from 63 to 56% from 1993 to 2001. At lower weights, purity usually declines because more filler is added to the drug.

Making and Distributing Cocaine

The coca plant, from which cocaine is produced, is grown primarily in the Andean region of Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia, with Columbia's production increasing from 1991 to 2001 while that of Peru and Bolivia has decreased. (See Figure 6.3.) According to the INCSR, 930 metric tons of cocaine were potentially available from the Andean region in 2001, 125 metric tons more than the year before. (See Figure 6.4.) More than three-quarters (78.5%) of the base came from Colombia, which produced 730 metric tons. The Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (BINLA) stresses the fact that these quantities are "potentials" and that actual results may be lower. The same estimating methods are used, however, one year to the next, suggesting that cocaine supplies were increasing.

Once the cocaine is converted into base, it is then transported from the jungles of Bolivia and Peru to southern Colombia, where it is processed into cocaine

TABLE 6.5
Worldwide potential illicit drug production, 1996-2003
[In metric tons]
SOURCE: "Worldwide Potential Drug Production, 1996-2003 (All Figures in metric Tons)," in International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, 2003, U.S. Department of State, Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, March 1, 2004, http://www.state.gov/g/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2003/ (accessed February 15, 2005)

2003 2002 2001 2,000 1999 1998 1997 1996
Opium gum
Afghanistan 2,865 1,278 74 3,656 2,861 2,340 2,184 2,174
India 47
Iran
Pakistan 5 5 11 37 66 85 75
    Total SW Asia 2,865 1,283 79 3,667 2,898 2,406 2,299 2,296
Burma 484 630 865 1,085 1,090 1,750 2,365 2,560
China
Laos 200 180 200 210 140 140 210 200
Thailand 9 6 6 6 16 25 30
Vietnam 10 15 15 11 20 45 25
    Total SE Asia 684 829 1,086 1,316 1,247 1,926 2,645 2,815
Colombia 61 66 63
Lebanon
Guatemala
Mexico 47 71 21 43 60 46 54
    Total other 47 71 21 118 121 112 118
     Total opium 3,549 2,159 1,236 5,004 4,263 4,453 5,056 4,285
Coca leaf
Boliviaa 17,210 19,800 20,200 26,800 22,800 52,900 70,100 75,100
Colombiab 583,000 437,600 347,000 302,900
Peru 52,700 52,600 54,400 69,200 95,600 130,200 174,700
Ecuador
    Total cocac 17,210 72,500 72,800 664,200 613,400 586,100 547,300 552,700
Cannabis
Mexico 7,900 7,400 7,000 3,700 8,300 8,600 11,700
Colombia 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,133 4,133
Jamaica 356
Belize
Other 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500
    Total cannabis 3,500 15,400 14,900 14,500 11,200 15,800 16,447 19,689
aBeginning in 2001, U.S. government surveys of Bolivian coca take place over the period June to June.
bSince leaf calculation is by fresh leaf weight in Colombia, in contrast to dry weight elsewhere, these boxes are blank.
c2002 and 2001 totals do not include Colombia. See footnote 2 above.

TABLE 6.6
Cocaine price ranges, 1993-2001
[In dollars per kilogram]
SOURCE: "Cocaine Price Ranges (per Kilogram)," in The NNICC Report 1997: The Supply of Illicit Drugs to the United States, National Narcotics Intelligence Consumers Committee, 1998, and "Cocaine 1998-2001 Price Data," in Illegal Drug Price and Purity Report, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, April 2003

Year National Miami New York City Chicago Los Angeles
1993 10,500-40,000 16,000-24,000 17,000-25,000 20,000-30,000 14,000-20,000
1994 10,500-40,000 16,000-22,000 16,000-23,000 21,000-25,000 15,000-20,000
1995 10,500-36,000 15,000-25,000 17,000-27,000 21,000-25,000 15,000-20,000
1996 10,500-36,000 14,000-25,000 16,000-25,000 18,000-25,000 12,500-20,000
1997 10,000-36,000 12,500-28,000 17,000-42,000 18,000-32,000 12,000-17,500
1998 10,000-36,000 12,500-28,000 15,300-30,000 21,000-25,000 13,000-17,000
1999 9,000-40,000 17,000-20,000 16,000-24,000 21,000-25,000 13,000-18,000
2000 9,000-42,000 17,000-29,000 21,000-28,000 18,000-25,000 12,500-18,500
2001 10,000-36,000 16,500-23,000 20,000-30,000 18,000-25,000 12,500-18,000

TABLE 6.7
Cocaine purity, 1993-2001
[Annual national average in percent]
SOURCE: "Cocaine Purity (Annual National Average—Percent)," in The NNICC Report 1997: The Supply of Illicit Drugs to the United States, National Narcotics Intelligence Consumers Committee, 1998, and "Cocaine 1998-2001 Purity Data," in Illegal Drug Price and Purity Report, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, April 2003

Year Kilogram Ounce Gram
1993 82 70 63
1994 83 74 63
1995 83 65 61
1996 82 67 61
1997 80 64 64
1998 82 69 69
1999 79 63 63
2000 72 56 59
2001 69 53 56

hydrochloride (white powder) at clandestine drug laboratories. Recently, small, independent Bolivian and Peruvian trafficking groups have also been processing cocaine. After processing, the powder is shipped to the United States and Europe.

Caribbean and Central American countries serve as transit countries for the shipment of drugs into the United States. Drug traffickers shift routes according to law enforcement and interdiction pressures. Recently, drug flow has been steadily increasing through the Central American countries. In the late 1990s Central American governments stepped up antidrug operations in response.

The Colombian government has disrupted the activities of two major drug-trafficking organizations, the Medellin and Cali cartels, by either capturing or killing their key leaders. Nonetheless, this disruption has not reduced drug-trafficking activities. Independent traffickers, as well as splinter groups from the Cali cartel, have increasingly moved into the market, and huge volumes of cocaine are still being shipped to the United States through the Caribbean.

MOST COCAINE ENTERS THE U.S. THROUGH MEXICO.

Much South American cocaine is sent to Mexican traffickers who smuggle the drug into the United States. As Mexican traffickers have become more sophisticated, it is suspected that many are bypassing their Colombian contacts and dealing directly with Peruvian and Bolivian producers.

Almost all drugs, especially cocaine, once entered the United States through Florida. Florida was a major entry point mainly because of its thousands of miles of coastline, where boats could secretly dock, and the millions of acres in the Everglades, where planes could covertly land. Though intensive law enforcement efforts make it more difficult to land drugs in Florida, cocaine continues to be transported through the Caribbean, Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, and Haiti to Florida from Colombia. According to the DEA's Drug Trafficking in the United States (http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/concern/drug_trafficking.html), Haiti and Jamaica are growing transport points for Colombian cocaine destined for eastern U.S. markets. Because of Jamaica's location between South America and the United States, it is increasingly significant. Cocaine is smuggled into Jamaica primarily by sea, then into the Bahamas, and finally to the Florida coast using speed-boats, pleasure craft, and fishing vessels.

Because of efforts to cease drug flow to Florida, nearly 65% of the cocaine sold in the United States today passes through Mexico and across the Mexico–U.S. border. The two-thousand-mile border is patrolled by a relatively small number of Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) officers, who must divide their limited time between illegal aliens trying to cross the border and drug traffickers trying to smuggle drugs into the United States. The United States has introduced soldiers into the area to assist the INS, although some observers question whether soldiers trained to fight wars have the correct preparation to patrol a border populated by farmers and ranchers.

Mexico, the main transit and distribution hub for drugs moving to the United States, now rivals Colombia for dominance of the Western Hemisphere drug trade. Powerful Mexican drug syndicates have become dominant in the cocaine trade and the U.S. wholesale market. The Mexican government has intensified its investigations of the four largest drug-trafficking organizations—the Juarez cartel, the Tijuana cartel, the Gulf cartel, and the Caro Quintero organization.

Most cocaine destined for the United States is transported from South American countries to northern Mexico. In the early 1990s traffickers used aircraft to deliver cocaine, but over the past few years they have shifted to the maritime movement of drugs. According to U.S. law enforcement officials, most drugs enter Mexico via ship or small boat through the Yucatan Peninsula and Baja California regions. In addition, more drugs are moving overland into Mexico, primarily through Guatemala.

After the drugs have been unloaded, the cocaine is transported, usually by truck, to warehouses in cities such as Guadalajara or Juarez, which are operating bases for the major drug organizations. Mexican smugglers, often with experience smuggling illegal workers, and who frequently have family or friends in the United States, are paid to carry the drugs across the border. Sometimes the drugs are carried across the FIGURE 6.3
Andean net coca cultivation, 1991-2001
SOURCE: "Andean Net Coca Cultivation Comparison, 1991-2001," in Drug Intelligence Brief: Changing Dynamics of Cocaine Production in the Andean Region, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, June 2002, http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/intel/02033/02033.html (accessed February 16, 2005)
FIGURE 6.4
Andean potential cocaine production, 1995-2001
SOURCE: "Andean Potential Cocaine Production (Metric Tons)," in Drug Intelligence Brief: Changing Dynamics of Cocaine Production in the Andean Region, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, June 2002, http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/intel/02033/02033.html (accessed February 16, 2005)
border in backpacks; sometimes they are hidden in cars and trucks; and, occasionally, they are flown into the United States.

In Mexico, where unemployment is high and the value of the peso dropped sharply in the mid-1990s, the hundreds or thousands of dollars to be earned from drug smuggling can be very attractive. Few of the smugglers know any more about the makeup of the drug ring than the identity of the individual who gives them the drugs; capturing them does not significantly restrict the flow of drugs.

Drug syndicates have become very powerful in Mexico, and Mexican traffickers use their vast wealth to corrupt and influence public officials. For example, in 1997 the head of Mexico's National Institute to Combat Drugs, General Jesus Gutierrez Rebello, was arrested for taking money and gifts from drug dealers. General Barry McCaffrey, the U.S. drug coordinator at the time, had recently praised the general for his integrity and commitment to the drug war.

Mexican drug organizations have been implicated in dozens of political assassinations in Tijuana since the mid-1990s. In 1994 a presidential candidate and Tijuana's police chief were assassinated, and a second police chief, Alfredo de la Torre Marquez, was assassinated in 1999. In 2000 the murders of two federal prosecutors and an army captain were among the many that American officials suspect were ordered by drug cartels. Other high-profile victims have included lawyers, police officers, judges, and prosecutors—anyone who might stand in the way of the high-stakes trafficking enterprise.

A major obstacle to joint law enforcement and prosecution efforts is the widespread corruption of Mexican officials, especially police. According to the INCSR, the Mexican authorities arrested forty-three corrupt police officials in 2002 who had been providing protection to the Arellano Felix Organization (AFO), another powerful drug cartel. The AFO was known to have made payments amounting to $1 million a week to Mexican federal, state, and local officials. A number of high-ranking AFO operatives were also arrested, and one was killed in a shoot-out. But corruption is very difficult to root out because drug profits are high and poverty widespread.

SMUGGLERS WILL USE ANY METHOD.

In 1993 Mexican police discovered an elaborate cocaine-smuggling tunnel that extended fourteen hundred feet from Tijuana, Mexico, to the outskirts of San Diego, California. Short tunnels have been found in the past, but nothing like this air-conditioned, well-lighted tunnel that would have provided a secret, comfortable route for transporting tons of cocaine. Those involved in smuggling find innumerable ways to get cocaine into the United States. The profits from even relatively small amounts of the drug are considered worth the risk of being caught.

Drug couriers will go to extreme lengths, including swallowing packets of drugs and excreting them after they have entered the United States. One courier had half a pound of cocaine surgically implanted under the skin of each of his thighs. Panamanian cocaine smugglers have developed a new technology that combines cocaine with vinyl, which is then incorporated into luggage and sneakers. The cocaine is separated after it reaches its destination.

The U.S. Customs Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service seized several kilograms of cocaine within a shipment of boa constrictors. The smugglers had wrapped the cocaine in rubber containers and forced them down the snakes' throats. Cocaine was found implanted in dogs' stomachs, and liquid cocaine was discovered in a shipment of tropical fish.

Cocaine may be hidden in the walls and support beams of cargo containers or mixed in with legal cargo such as coffee. Fishing vessels with hidden compartments often conceal cocaine. Cocaine is hidden in the walls of planes flying regularly scheduled flights. Other smugglers drop the cocaine by parachute to waiting accomplices below. Some traffickers have bought old, propeller-driven airplanes to fly in cocaine. And, with the price of aging jet aircraft dropping sharply, some smugglers have even bought Boeing 727 jets to haul in large amounts of drugs. Sixty-five pounds of cocaine was once found hidden inside the cockpit of an American Airlines Boeing 757 jetliner.

AFTER COCAINE REACHES THE UNITED STATES.

The primary entry ports into the United States are southern Florida, southern California, Arizona, and Texas. Colombia-based traffickers continue to control wholesale-level distribution throughout the northeastern United States and along the eastern seaboard in cities such as Boston, Miami, Newark, New York City, and Philadelphia, often employing Dominican criminals as subordinates. Mexico-based traffickers operate out of Chicago and control the western and midwestern United States in such cities as Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Houston, Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Diego, San Francisco, and Seattle.

From these distribution cities, drug carriers transport cocaine throughout the country in commercial and private vehicles, including trains, buses, airplanes, and even postal trucks. U.S. law enforcement officials have encountered smuggling operations that use concealed compartments within campers, recreational vehicles, tractor trailers, and vans. Modern communications have made it difficult to catch the drug dealers. They keep in touch using beepers and pay phones in efforts to avoid getting caught.

Many observers note that drug traffickers have little difficulty funneling drugs north through Mexico because

TABLE 6.8
Cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, and cannabis seizures, by the federal government and selected foreign countries, 1989-2003
[In kilograms]
SOURCE: "Table 44. Federalwide Cocaine, Heroin, Methamphetamine, and Cannabis Seizures, 1989-2003 (Kilograms)," in National Drug Control Strategy: Data Supplement, The White House, February 2004, http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs04/table44.doc (accessed March 31, 2005)

Cannabis
Year Cocaine Heroin Methamphetamine Marijuana Hashish
1989 114,903 1,311 393,276 23,043
1990 96,085 687 233,478 7,683
1991 128,247 1,448 224,603 79,110
1992 120,175 1,251 344,899 111
1993 121,215 1,502 7 409,922 11,396
1994 129,378 1,285 178 474,856 561
1995 111,031 1,543 369 627,776 14,470
1996 128,555 1,362 136 638,863 37,851
1997 101,495 1,624 1,099 698,799 756
1998 118,436 1,458 2,559 827,149 241
1999 132,063 1,151 2,779 1,075,154 797
2000 106,619 1,674 3,470 1,235,938 10,867
2001 105,748 2,496 4,051 1,214,188 161
2002 102,711 2,773 2,521 1,100,439 621
2003 115,725 2,351 3,573 1,224,213 155
—Data not available.

of Mexico's weak political and law enforcement institutions, but traffickers appear to have an equally easy time moving drugs across the United States.

HOW MUCH COCAINE IS SEIZED?

To give an idea of how enormous the challenge is to find smuggled drugs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (a part of the Department of Homeland Security created via the 2003 merger of the U.S. Customs Service and the Border Patrol) reported in its annual report (Performance and Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2003, Washington, DC: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, http://www.customs.gov/linkhandler/cgov/toolbox/publications/admin/accountability_report_2003.ctt/cbpAnnualReportMarch04.pdf) that during fiscal year 2003, 70.9 million people entered the country on commercial airlines. Another fifteen million came by sea and 327 million by land through more than three hundred ports of entry. The Service also handled over 130 million trucks, aircraft, boats, and ships.

Customs and Border Protection estimates that two-thirds of all cocaine entering the United States crosses through a border facility manned by a government agent. Most of it is hidden in some way in the huge number of tractor trailers and passenger vehicles. Customs estimates that it seizes only 10% of smuggled drugs. Many experts believe it seizes much less.

For the United States, interdiction, or stopping drugs at the border, has been a high-priority, high-visibility effort in the war against drugs. In 2003 all federal cocaine seizures were 115,725 kilograms. (See Table 6.8.) In fiscal year 2003 the Customs Service seized or assisted in seizing 76,300 pounds of cocaine, a reduction from previous years due, according to the Customs Service, to lower traffic overall and heightened vigilance.

User Comments Add a comment…