When it came to understanding their child's curriculum, just 43% of foreign-born Latino parents said they knew a lot compared to 66% of native Latino parents and a similar share of African-American and white parents. (See Figure 7.10.) While 99% of all Latino parents thought it was important for schools to teach English to the children of immigrants, 93% of foreign-born Latino parents thought schools should also help students maintain their native tongue. Native Latino parents were somewhat less interested (81%) in having schools provide such instruction.
National Standardized Test Scores
Educational achievement in core subjects like reading, math, and science was considered by educators as a predictor of children's likelihood of completing high school, attending college, and attaining high-paying careers. According to the Pew Hispanic Center fact sheet "Hispanic School Achievement: Catching Up Requires Running Faster than White Youth" (Washington, DC, January 2004), in 2000 the average score on a standardized math test for kindergartners was 45.5 for white children, 40.0 for all Hispanic children, and 38.4 for African-American children. Children whose parents were born in Mexico, the Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico on average scored significantly lower than their white peers. However, children whose parents were born in Cuba (46.1 score) outperformed their white peers. (See Table 7.15.) The number of generations a Hispanic child
FIGURE 7.9
Ratings of schools, by demographic characteristics, 2003
Knowledge of child's curriculum by parents, by demographic characteristics, 2003
Average math test scores of 1st- and 2nd-generation
kindergartners, by parental country of birth
| Parental birth place | |
| Mexico | 38.6 |
| Dominican Republic | 35.7 |
| Puerto Rico | 37.3 |
| Cuba | 46.1 |
| El Salvador | 39.7 |
| Other Central America | 39.4 |
| South America | 42.4 |
was removed from the country of origin appeared to make no difference in educational achievement. Eighth-grade math scores and middle-school grade point averages were very similar regardless of whether the child was native-born or foreign-born.
In 2000 the dropout rate for Hispanic students age sixteen to nineteen was 21.1% ("High School Dropout Rates for Latino Youth," ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban
FIGURE 7.11
Immigration history of parents of 2004 Intel Science Talent Search finalists
Children of Immigrants Succeed in Math and
Science Competitions
A study by the National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) found that "an astounding 60% of the top science students in the United States and 65% of the top math students are the children of immigrants. In addition, foreign-born high school students make up 50% of the 2004 U.S. Math Olympiad's top scorers, 38% of the U.S. Physics Team, and 25% of the Intel Science Talent Search finalists," which is considered the most prestigious award for young scientists and mathematicians in the United States (Stuart Anderson, The Multiplier Effect, Arlington, VA: National Foundation for American Policy, 2004). NFAP described itself as a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization engaged in public policy research on trade, immigration, and other national issues.
While the study focused on prestigious competitions that attracted outstanding science and math students, children of immigrants made an impressive showing. Eighteen of the forty finalists in the 2004 Intel Science Talent Search had parents who entered the United States on professional status H-1B visas. Clearly these students had at least one highly educated parent. However, the parents of three finalists entered the country as family-sponsored immigrants, the parents of two competitors came as refugees, and one parent won a diversity lottery visa. (See Figure 7.11.) Stuart Anderson, author of the NFAP study, commented, "If those who most oppose immigration had succeeded over the past two decades, two-thirds of the most outstanding future scientists and mathematicians in the United States would not be in the country."
User Comments Add a comment…