Library Index :: World Poverty :: Women and Children in Poverty - Global Conventions On The Rights Of Women And Children, Progress Toward International Goals, The Feminization Of Poverty

Women and Children in Poverty - Poor Women's Health

It is not surprising that poor people suffer from more health problems and receive a lower quality of health care than their nonpoor counterparts. Women, however, suffer disproportionately, first because there simply are more poor women than poor men in the world, and second because, as the bearers of children, women face a different set of potential diseases, illnesses, and injuries related to their reproductive systems.

The Millennium Development Goal of improving maternal health, as opposed to women's health, points to the significance of reproduction in the overall picture of women's health, as well as in the social and economic status of their families. A mother's health typically reflects the health of her entire family, just as a mother's education reflects that of her children (see section below). Of the link between poverty and maternal health, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) executive director Thoraya Obaid stated in October 2005: "If women are healthy then they can jump start the life of their family and the economy" ("Women's Health Fuelling Poverty," BBC News, October 12, 2005, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4331996.stm).

Reproductive Health and Poverty

In State of World Population 2005. The Promise of Equality: Gender Equity, Reproductive Health, and the MDGs the UNFPA cites illnesses of the reproductive system as the leading cause of death and disability of women globally and the second most common cause of poor health in the world after communicable diseases. According to an estimate by the Alan Guttmacher Institute, women's reproductive health issues result in the loss of as much as 250 million years' worth of productive time each year and a 20% reduction of women's overall productivity ("The Benefits of Investing in Sexual and Reproductive Health," Issues in Brief, 2004). The UNFPA reported in 2005 that complications of pregnancy and childbirth kill one woman every minute and injure twenty others—99% of them in developing countries. Figure 7.4 provides a breakdown of the causes of maternal death as reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005. According to the State of the World Population, several aspects of reproductive health have wide-reaching and long-term socioeconomic effects on families, communities, countries, and even entire regions.

Because most maternal deaths occur in already impoverished countries that are clustered together geographically, their regional impact is particularly acute. At the most personal level, children who lose their mothers tend to experience emotional problems that eventually may make them less productive as adults, and households lose valuable income without an adult female wage earner; many families, in fact, are pushed over the brink of poverty as a result of the

FIGURE 7.4 Causes of maternal death "Figure 4.1. Causes of Maternal Death," in The World Health Report 2005: Make Every Mother and Child Count, World Health Organization, 2005, http://www.who.int/whr/2005/whr2005_en.pdf (accessed April 10, 2006)

TABLE 7.4 Economic effects of fatal illness in the household, 1992 Margaret E. Greene and Thomas Merrick, "Table 1. Economic Effects of Fatal Illness in the Household," in Poverty Reduction: Does Reproductive Health Matter?, HNP Discussion Paper 33399, The World Bank, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, July 2005, http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/08/22/000012009_20050822094645/Rendered/PDF/333990HNP0Gree1tyReduction01public1.pdf (accessed April 10, 2006). Data based on Over et al., 1992.

TABLE 7.4
Economic effects of fatal illness in the household, 1992
Timing of Impact
Type of effects Before illness During illness Immediate effect of death Long term effect of death
SOURCE: Margaret E. Greene and Thomas Merrick, "Table 1. Economic Effects of Fatal Illness in the Household," in Poverty Reduction: Does Reproductive Health Matter?, HNP Discussion Paper 33399, The World Bank, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, July 2005, http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/08/22/000012009_20050822094645/Rendered/PDF/333990HNP0Gree1tyReduction01public1.pdf (accessed April 10, 2006). Data based on Over et al., 1992.
Effect on production and earnings Organization of economic activity
Residential location
Reduced productivity of ill adult

Reallocation of labor
Lost output of deceased Lost output of deceased
Reallocation of land and labor
Effect on investment and consumption Insurance
Medical costs of prevention
Precautionary savings
Transfer to other households
Medical cost of treatment
Dissaving
Changes in consumption and investment
Funeral costs
Transfers
Legal fees
Changes in type and quantity of investment and consumption
Effect on household health and composition Extended family
Fertility
Reduced allocation of labor to health maintaining activities Loss of deceased Poor health of surviving household members
Dissolution or reconstitution of household
Psychic costs Disutility of ill person Disutility to person
Grief of loved ones

high cost of health care when a mother becomes sick. (See Table 7.4.) Communities feel the loss because women in developing countries perform so many essential unpaid tasks, such as caring for children and elders, growing and harvesting food, and gathering fuel and water. High rates of maternal deaths affect the overall economic situation in a region in terms of lost productivity and lost potential for economic, cultural, and technological expansion.

WHO's World Health Report 2005: Make Every Mother and Child Count warns that if progress on improving maternal health continues at the slow rate it has seen since the 1990s, the Millennium Development Goals will not be met by 2015. Of the 136 million births every year, 529,000 result in the death of the mother; as of 2005, 300 million women were experiencing illnesses brought on by pregnancy or childbirth. WHO maintains that most of those deaths could be prevented with increased access to skilled care during and following childbirth. In 2005, 43% of mothers and newborns received some care at birth, but not enough to prevent the complications that often arise. Additionally, WHO reports that increased public expenditures on health care, higher wages for health care workers, and universal access to medical care are essential to reaching the MDGs, especially those that relate to women and children.

Table 7.5 illustrates the link between reproductive rights and the MDGs. Included in reproductive rights are issues such as violence against women and the rights to marry voluntarily, space children as desired, receive clear and accurate information about the reproductive process, and benefit from scientific progress. For women living in low-income countries, these rights cannot be TABLE 7.5 Reproductive rights and the MDGs (Millennium Development Goals) "Reproductive Rights and the MDGs," in State of World Population 2005, United Nations Population Fund, 2005, http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2005/pdf/en_swp05.pdf (accessed April 8, 2006)

TABLE 7.5
Reproductive rights and the MDGs (Millennium Development Goals)
Elements of reproductive rights Examples of rights-based actions Relevance to specific Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
SOURCE: "Reproductive Rights and the MDGs," in State of World Population 2005, United Nations Population Fund, 2005, http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2005/pdf/en_swp05.pdf (accessed April 8, 2006)
Right to life and survival Prevent avoidable maternal and infant deaths
End neglect of and discrimination against girls that can contribute to premature deaths
Ensure access to information and methods to prevent sexually transmitted infections, including HIV
Promote gender equality and empower women (MDG 3)
Reduce child mortality (MDG 4)
Improve maternal health (MDG 5)
Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases (MDG 6)
Right to liberty and security of the person Take measures to prevent, punish and eradicate all forms of gender-based violence
Enable women, men and adolescents to make reproductive decisions free of coercion, violence and discrimination
Eliminate female genital mutilation/cutting
Stop sexual trafficking
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger (MDG 1)
Promote gender equality and empower women (MDG 3)
Reduce child mortality (MDG 4)
Improve maternal health (MDG 5)
Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases (MDG 6)
Right to seek, receive and impart information Make information about reproductive health and rights issues and related policies and laws widely and freely available
Provide full information for people to make informed reproductive health decisions
Support reproductive health and family life education both in and out of schools
Promote gender equality and empower women (MDG 3)
Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases (MDG 6)
Right to decide the number, timing and spacing of children Provide people with full information that enables them to choose and correctly use a family planning method
Provide access to a full range of modern contraceptive methods
Enable adolescent girls to delay pregnancy
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger (MDG 1)
Achieve universal primary education (MDG 2)
Promote gender equality and empower women (MDG 3)
Ensure environmental stability (MDG 7)
Right to voluntarily marry and establish a family Prevent and legislate against child and forced marriages
Prevent and treat sexually transmitted infections that cause infertility
Provide reproductive health services, including for HIV prevention, to married adolescent girls and their husbands
Achieve universal primary education (MDG 2)
Promote gender equality and empower women (MDG 3)
Reduce child mortality (MDG 4)
Improve maternal health (MDG 5)
Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases (MDG 6)
Right to the highest attainable standard of health Provide access to affordable, acceptable, comprehensive and quality reproductive health information and services
Allocate available resources fairly, prioritizing those with least access to reproductive health education and services
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger (MDG 1)
Promote gender equality and empower women (MDG 3)
Reduce child mortality (MDG 4)
Improve maternal health (MDG 5)
Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases (MDG 6)
Right to the benefits of scientific progress Fund contraceptive research, including female-controlled methods, microbicides and male methods
Offer a variety of contraceptive options
Provide access to emergency obstetric care that can prevent maternal deaths and obstetric fistula
Promote gender equality and empower women (MDG 3)
Reduce child mortality (MDG 4)
Improve maternal health (MDG 5)
Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases (MDG 6)
Right to non-discrimination and equality in education and employment Prohibit discrimination in employment based on pregnancy, proof of contraceptive use or motherhood
Establish programmes to keep girls in schools
Ensure pregnant and married adolescent girls, and young mothers, are able to complete their education
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger (MDG 1)
Achieve universal primary education (MDG 2)
Promote gender equality and empower women (MDG 3)
Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases (MDG 6)

taken for granted. In fact, many are prohibited from using contraception—or from even receiving information about it—and must marry whomever their families choose for them. In some cultures, going against these conventions can place the woman in a position that results in physical and emotional violence. The inability to decide how many children to have or how many years apart to have them can easily overwhelm a family's finances, particularly a family that is already poor. There are also health considerations: a woman who can control her reproductive choices is more likely to receive adequate health care, and thus less likely to die in childbirth.

In Poverty Reduction: Does Reproductive Health Matter? (World Bank Health, Nutrition and Population, July 2005), Margaret E. Greene and Thomas Merrick argue that controversy over reproductive rights—namely, abortion and birth control—has hit poor women particularly hard. According to Greene and Merrick, the issue has actually harmed poor women's health: governments have been pressured to cut funding for medical care and family planning, and the United Nations was forced to drop the goal of achieving universal reproductive health care from the Millennium Declaration. The United Nations Population Fund reports in State of the World Population 2005 that as of 2005 the world's women suffered disproportionately from sexual and reproductive health problems—nearly 35% of women globally versus less than 20% of men.

Figure 7.5 shows the percentages of the poorest and wealthiest women who give birth with the attendance of skilled medical personnel in selected low-income countries. Poor women are far less likely to have a skilled attendant present during the births of their children. In Vietnam, where 100% of the richest women have access to medical personnel during childbirth, only 58% of the poorest women do. In Ethiopia just 1% of the poorest FIGURE 7.5 Births attended by skilled personnel among the poorest and richest women, selected countries, 2004 "Figure 2. Births Attended by Skilled Personnel among the Poorest and Richest Women," in State of World Population 2005, United Nations Population Fund, 2005, http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2005/pdf/en_swp05.pdf (accessed April 8, 2006). Data from World Bank, 2004, Round II Country Reports on Health, Nutrition, and Population Conditions among the Poor and the Better-Off in 56 Countries.women receive medical attendance at childbirth, versus 25% of the wealthiest women. These numbers demonstrate that the world's poorest women do not have reproductive rights equal to those of their nonpoor counterparts.

Lack of family planning options most strongly affects poor young women, who may not be prepared for pregnancy and parenthood physically, emotionally, or financially. Figure 7.6 shows the disparity of contraceptive use among the poorest and richest women in Ghana, Yemen, Guatemala, the Philippines, India, and Kazakhstan. In Guatemala, for example, only 5% of the nation's poorest women use contraceptives compared with 60% of wealthy women. Figure 7.7 compares childbearing among the poorest and richest women under age eighteen in Niger, Nicaragua, Nepal, Tanzania, Kenya, Bolivia, and Turkey. In Niger nearly three-quarters (72%) of poor women had given birth by age eighteen, FIGURE 7.6 Contraceptive use according to wealth, selected countries, 2004 "Figure 3. Contraceptive Use according to Wealth," in State of World Population 2005, United Nations Population Fund, 2005, http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2005/pdf/en_swp05.pdf (accessed April 8, 2006). Data from World Bank, 2004, Round II Country Reports on Health, Nutrition, and Population Conditions among the Poor and the Better-Off in 56 Countries.compared with two-fifths (39%) of wealthy women. In reviewing economic and sociological publications on the link between poverty and early childbearing, Greene and Merrick cite the following points of connection:

  • Poor health outcomes for the young mother and her child: higher risk of obstetric complications, leading to higher maternal mortality and morbidity (illness or disease) if she survives; increased risk of abortion and abortion complications if the abortion is unsafe; and low birth weight and other problems for the newborn
  • Poor educational outcomes for both the mother and her child, including dropping out of school and less schooling for the child
  • Lower and/or altered investment and spending patterns in the mother's immediate and extended family (costs of medical care and child care, for example, can make it difficult or impossible to save money)
  • Possibly lower labor force participation by the young mother, with less opportunity to contribute to household income
  • Reduced community participation and greater chances of divorce or single parenthood

Early childbearing tends to occur more often in poor countries but even in wealthier countries the highest rates of fertility among adolescents are found among the FIGURE 7.7 Childbearing among the poorest and richest adolescents, selected countries, 2004 "Figure 4. Childbearing among the Poorest and Richest Adolest Adolescents," in State of World Population 2005, United Nations Population Fund, 2005, http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2005/pdf/en_swp05.pdf (accessed April 8, 2006). Data from Rani, M. and E. Lule, 2004, "Exploring the Socioeconomic Dimension of Adolescent Reproductive Health: A Multicountry Analysis" International Family Planning Perspectives, 30 (3): 112.poorest groups. Greene and Merrick reported that in 2004, for example, out of a sample of fifty-five countries, the average adolescent fertility rate (the number of women who had given birth before age twenty) for the richest group was 62.6 per 100,000 population, versus 148.6 per 100,000 population for the poorest group. The highest regional rates for adolescent poor women were in Latin America and the Caribbean (172.6 births per 100,000 population), followed by sub-Saharan Africa (169.6). The sampled region with the lowest adolescent fertility rate was East Asia, at forty-six births per 100,000, but it is important to note that in that region only four countries were sample, compared with twenty-nine countries in sub-Saharan.

According to Greene and Merrick, studies have shown that poor women of all ages experience more difficulties with pregnancy and childbearing, but adolescent mothers have more extreme problems because their bodies may not be developed enough to sustain the physical challenges of giving birth. In developing countries women aged fifteen to nineteen are twice as likely to die from complications of childbirth than women in their twenties. Women in poor countries tend to marry and begin having children earlier than women in wealthier countries. This is partly the cause of the significantly higher number of maternal deaths in underdeveloped and developing regions. (See Table 7.6.) In fact, as Table 7.6 illustrates, the total number of maternal deaths increased annually from 515,000 in 1995 to 529,000 in 2000. Developing regions overall saw an increase from 512,000 in 1995 to 527,000 in 2000, with Asia experiencing the greatest increase. Figure 7.8 shows the various factors that link early pregnancy with poverty. Factors such as a lack of education, childhood and adult illness and malnutrition, a lack of access to natural resources and involvement in the global economy, and high mortality rates can all be linked to higher fertility rates, which in turn lead to lower per capita income.

OBSTETRIC FISTULA

One of the most serious health and social consequences of childbirth in poor countries—particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia—is the development of obstetric fistula. This childbirth-related injury is caused by exceptionally long labor, often as long as five to seven days, that cuts off blood flow to the vagina, bladder, and/or rectum. The resulting holes in the tissue leave women unable to control the flow of TABLE 7.6 Comparison of 1995 and 2000 regional and global totals of maternal mortality Margaret E. Greene and Thomas Merrick, "Table 5. Comparison of 1995 and 2000 Regional and Global Totals," in Poverty Reduction: Does Reproductive Health Matter?, HNP Discussion Paper 33399, The World Bank, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, July 2005, http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/08/22/000012009_20050822094645/Rendered/PDF/333990HNP0Gree1tyReduction01public1.pdf (accessed April 10, 2006). Data from AbouZahr and Wardlaw, 2004.

TABLE 7.6
Comparison of 1995 and 2000 regional and global totals of maternal mortality
Region 2000 1995
Maternal mortality ratio Maternal deaths (in thousands) Maternal mortality ratio Maternal deaths (in thousands)
*Developed regions include Canada, United States of America, Japan, Australia and New Zealand, which are excluded from the regional averages.
SOURCE: Margaret E. Greene and Thomas Merrick, "Table 5. Comparison of 1995 and 2000 Regional and Global Totals," in Poverty Reduction: Does Reproductive Health Matter?, HNP Discussion Paper 33399, The World Bank, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, July 2005, http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/08/22/000012009_20050822094645/Rendered/PDF/333990HNP0Gree1tyReduction01public1.pdf (accessed April 10, 2006). Data from AbouZahr and Wardlaw, 2004.
World total 400 529,000 400 515,000
Developed regions* 20 2,500 21 2,800
Europe 28 2.2 36 3.2
Developing regions 440 527,000 440 512,000
Africa 830 251,000 1,000 273,000
Northern Africa 130 4,600 200 7,200
Sub-Saharan Africa 920 247,000 1,100 265,000
Asia 330 253,000 280 217,000
Eastern Asia 55 11,000 60 13,000
South-central Asia 520 207,000 410 158,000
South-eastern Asia 210 25,000 300 35,000
Western Asia 190 9,800 230 11,000
Latin America & the Caribbean 190 22,000 190 22,000
Oceania 240 530 260 560

FIGURE 7.8 Channels linking early pregnancy and childbearing to poverty Margaret E. Greene and Thomas Merrick, "Figure 2. Channels Linking Early Pregnancy and Childbearing to Poverty," in Poverty Reduction: Does Reproductive Health Matter?, HNP Discussion Paper 33399, The World Bank, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, July 2005, http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/08/22/000012009_20050822094645/Rendered/PDF/333990HNP0Gree1tyReduction01public1.pdf (accessed April 10, 2006). Data from Ruger et al., 2001.urine and feces, which leak out constantly. Nerve damage to the legs, severe infections, and kidney disease are also common among fistula sufferers.

According to the Fistula Foundation (www.fistulafoundation.org/) and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), more than two million women in the developing world are known to suffer from obstetric fistula, which was virtually eradicated in wealthier countries when caesarian sections became commonplace in the late nineteenth century. The actual number of women who live with the condition is believed to be much higher, since it is rarely discussed and most women who suffer from it never get medical help. WHO estimates that in Nigeria alone, for example, as many as 800,000 women have fistulas, with 20,000 more developing the condition every year ("545 Women Operated on during 'Fistula Fortnight,'" March 7, 2005). Globally, obstetric fistula is believed to occur in 50,000 to 100,000 women per year, most of them under the age of twenty.

According to UNFPA's Campaign to End Fistula (www.endfistula.org/):

Poverty, malnutrition, poor health services, early marriage, and gender discrimination are interlinked root causes of obstetric fistula. Poverty is the main social risk factor because it is associated with early marriage and malnutrition and because poverty reduces a woman's chances of getting timely obstetric care.

Obstetric fistula is a cause of poverty among women as well as a consequence. Sufferers are often abandoned by their husbands and families and ostracized by their communities because of the stigma attached to their condition. Many are driven from their homes and left to survive or die on their own. The condition can, however, be repaired with surgery, which has about a 93% cure rate, according to the Fistula Foundation. However, few women in affected regions either know about the surgery, which costs from $100 to $400, or have access to it, and most cannot afford it.

In 2003 the first major report on fistula—Obstetric Fistula Needs Assessment Report: Findings from Nine African Countries—was published jointly by the UNFPA and the nonprofit organization EngenderHealth. Focusing on the countries most affected by obstetric fistula, the report identified seven critical needs of regions with the highest numbers of fistula sufferers, including education about the physical dangers of early marriage and pregnancy, family planning and maternal health; increased medical care in the form of prevention and treatment; social support services to address the physical and psychological needs of fistula sufferers.

EDUCATION: A TOOL TO LIFT WOMEN OUT OF POVERTY

The Beijing Platform declared that education is an essential human right that contributes to economic development at all levels of society—a declaration that has been supported by the UN, UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the World Bank, and most nongovernmental organizations. However, according to the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2006: Literacy for Life (2005, http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID1/443283&URL_DO1/4DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION1/4201.html), at least 771 million adults over the age of fifteen—one-fifth of the world's adult population—cannot read or write at a functional level; at least two-thirds of them are women.

In its State of the World Population 2002: People, Poverty, and Possibilities (2002, http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2002/english/ch1/), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) reports that 31% of women had no formal education in 2000, versus 18% of men. There are many reasons for this disparity, and poverty is chief among them: although women are almost universally less likely to attain high levels of education, being female and poor is, according to the UNFPA report, a "double disadvantage." In rural areas the long walking distances to schools discourage families from sending girls because they fear girls will be sexually assaulted on the way. Fees for attendance, books, and uniforms can also affect whether girls are sent to school. Again, girls in some regions are vulnerable to sexual exploitation from wealthier men who offer to pay for girls' schooling in exchange for sex. Early marriage and pregnancy also cause millions of girls to drop out of school every year. Many families decide to keep daughters at home to help tend and harvest crops, do housework, and care for elders and young siblings. The costs associated with educating girls are generally not seen as worthwhile because girls are not expected to continue their education or earn a living when they grow up. More simply, in many cultures girls are not valued in the same way that boys are, so to many impoverished families educating them seems like a waste of time and money—and in some places it is altogether forbidden.

Barbara Herz and Gene B. Sperling report in What Works in Girls' Education: Evidence and Policies from the Developing World (2004, http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/Girls_Education_full.pdf) that education for girls in developing countries is essential for economic success at all levels of society. The benefits of educating girls are seen from families to nations, in the forms of higher wages, faster economic growth, and more productive farming. This in turn results in decreased levels of malnutrition; women having smaller, healthier, more educated families; reducing the spread of HIV/AIDS; reducing rates of violence against women; and fostering democratic participation in society.

According to Herz and Sperling, when girls attend school just one year beyond the average, they eventually earn 10% to 20% more than average as adults. On the macroeconomic level, even modest increases in the number of women receiving a secondary education can lead to an increase in annual per capita income of 0.3%; likewise, as per capita growth continues, more girls achieve higher levels of education—a cycle that is beneficial, ultimately, for everyone. Similarly, the more education women have, the lower their rates of fertility will be. In Brazil, for example, illiterate women have an average of six children each, whereas literate women average 2.5 children each. Lower overall fertility rates lead to healthier, better-educated children. In fact, infant mortality rates are between 5% and 10% lower among girls who stay in school just one year longer than average. In countries where girls receive as many years of schooling as boys, infant mortality rates are 25% lower than in countries that do not have educational gender parity (equality).

Herz and Sperling conclude that governments of low-income countries can encourage families to educate their daughters and increase overall educational gender parity by eliminating school fees, providing local schools with flexible schedules that are safe for girls, and focusing on providing a quality education that realistically takes into account the needs of girls and their families.

Table 7.7 shows which countries achieved the Millennium Development Goal of gender parity in education as of 2002, those that are likely to achieve the goal by 2005, those that are likely to achieve the goal by 2015, and those countries that are in danger of not achieving the goal by 2015.

VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

Violence against women happens in every economic class of every culture around the world. While it is a TABLE 7.7 Country prospects for the achievement of gender parity in primary and secondary education by 2005 and 2015 "Table 2. 10. Country Prospects for the Achievement of Gender Parity in Primary and Secondary Education by 2005 and 2015," in Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2006: Literacy for Life, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2005, http://www.unesco.org/education/GMR2006/full/chapt2_eng.pdf (accessed April 8, 2006). Copyright © UNESCO, 2005multifaceted social problem, many experts consider it to be largely a health issue because of the physical and emotional havoc it wreaks on its victims; the other dimension of violence against women is that it is a human rights issue. Amnesty International calls it "a major human rights scandal and a public health crisis" ("Women, Violence, and Health," March 2004, http://www.web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGACT770012005?open&of1/4ENG-366). Although hard data are difficult to obtain because of the covert nature of the problem, there is a known link between violence against women and poverty. Figure 7.9 shows percentages of women in selected low-income countries who believed wife-beating was justified as of 2004. The reasons given—presented in the graph's "Note"—are indicative of the status of women in these cultures.

In Addressing Violence against Women and Achieving the Millennium Development Goals (2005, http://www.who.int/gender/documents/MDGs&VAWSept05.pdf), the WHO cites two main reasons poor women are more vulnerable to violence than their nonpoor counterparts: fewer resources—in terms of both money and support services—to help women avoid or escape violence; and the stressors of poverty, such as hunger, unemployment, and lack of education, that may lead some men to become violent or exacerbate an already violent situation. In addition, women who work in unregulated, informal employment are often subject to physical, sexual, or psychological abuse by their employers. In both developing and developed countries, social standards and enforced gender roles contribute to the incidence of violence.

The WHO report recommends several global economic actions that can affect women who are routine victims of violence:

  • Promote increased access to postprimary, vocational and technical education for women
  • Address gender gaps in earnings as well as barriers to accessing credit for women
  • Extend and upgrade childcare benefits to enable women's full participation in the paid labor market
  • Address issues of occupational segregation that often translate into inferior conditions of employment for women

FIGURE 7.9 Women who believe wife beating is justified for at least one reason, selected countries, 2004 "Figure 5. Women Who Believe Wife Beating Is Justified for at Least One Reason," in State of World Population 2005, United Nations Population Fund, 2005, http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2005/pdf/en_swp05.pdf (accessed April 8, 2006). Data from Kishor, S. and K. Johnson, 2004, Profiling Domestic Violence: A Multicountry Study, Calverton, MD: ORC Macro, Measure DHS+:66.

  • Ensure social protection and benefits for women in precarious employment situations—often those involved in informal employment

The WHO report notes, however, that increasing women's economic and social opportunities can actually put them at greater risk of violence, as such opportunities can breed resentment from the men in their lives. The WHO emphasizes that a well-funded and developed social support system is essential if poor women are to permanently escape violence. Educational programs are particularly important, for both women and men, if perceived gender roles are to be expanded to include advancement for women without the danger of violence.

Exact figures for incidences of violence are almost impossible to obtain, because most violent acts committed against women—especially in developing countries—go unreported. However, it is estimated that 10% to 50% of women around the world have been assaulted by their husbands or male partners at some point. The numbers rise when brothers and other male relatives who perpetrate the violence are counted. In fact, physical and sexual assaults committed by male family members are the most common type of violence against women. In developing countries this type of violence is largely the result of traditional gender norms, most of which have evolved out of men's social and economic dominance over women.

The connection between poverty and violence against women lies primarily in that dominance. In many cultures women are completely dependent on their husbands and male relatives for survival. Amnesty International cites laws that prohibit women from owning or inheriting property and from divorcing abusive husbands; hierarchies that allow fathers, brothers, and husbands to withhold access to food, clothing, and shelter; and customs, such as "wife inheritance" and honor crimes, that force women to obey male relatives or risk exile or death.

In addition, violent conflicts at the village, tribal, and national level reduce millions of women and children to refugee status, leaving them vulnerable to unemployment, disease, starvation, rape, and kidnapping. Millions more women and children (the UN estimates thirty million worldwide) end up as victims of international sex trafficking; the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Administration for Children and Families reports that poor women may be lured into the sex trade by promises of a good job in another country, or they may be sold into the trade by their parents, brothers, husbands, or male partners. Others are abducted and forced into the trade. Taken together, these factors leave poor women especially vulnerable to physical, sexual, and psychological violence.

Furthermore, a woman who has suffered domestic violence is more likely to become impoverished. Globally, with as many as one in three women being violently assaulted in her lifetime, the chances of severe, debilitating injury to a large number of abused women are high. In a November 2005 address before the U.S. Congressional Human Rights Caucus, S. K. Guha of UNIFEM noted that violence against women is increasingly acknowledged to be both a consequence and a cause of poverty among women and children. Severely abused women are generally unable to work, especially if they are also responsible for performing the physical labor of harvesting food and gathering fuel and water for their families.

Violence against Women in the United States

In the United States domestic violence is conclusively linked to homelessness among women and children. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) reports that domestic violence was cited by 50% of U.S cities surveyed in 2005 as a primary cause of homelessness (http://www.aclu.org/pdfs/dvhomelessness032106.pdf). Further, the ACLU notes that 50% of homeless women in San Diego, California, reported being the victims of domestic violence, and that in Minnesota, one-third of homeless women indicated that they left their homes to escape domestic violence. Overall, according to the National Network to End Domestic Violence, Domestic Violence (September 2004; http://www.nnedv.org/pdf/Homelessness.pdf), 92% of homeless women in the United States have at some point been the victims of severe physical and/or sexual abuse.

VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT 2005

In December 2005 both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives passed the Violence against Women Act 2005 (VAWA), which was part of the larger Department of Justice authorization bill. The VAWA 2005 is a reauthorization of an earlier act passed in 1994. The 2005 version of VAWA enhanced the provisions of its earlier version, with increased funding for violence-prevention programs, emergency shelter for women and children, and long-term housing solutions for low-income women and their children. The act also mandates that abused women be allowed to take ten days off from work each year to attend court or to look for housing, and it provides greater access to law enforcement and the justice system for abused immigrant woman who would otherwise have no legal recourse and might have to leave the country with abusive partners. Because violent relationships tend to affect poor women disproportionately in the United States, the provisions of the VAWA that allow time off from work and help for immigrant women mean that more poor women will be able to keep their jobs and remain in the country while they make arrangements to leave and/or prosecute their abusers.

POVERTY'S YOUNGEST VICTIMS

According to the report State of the World's Children 2006: Excluded and Invisible (2005, http://www.unicef.org/egypt/sowc06_fullreport.pdf) by the United Nations Children's Fund's (UNICEF), the least developed FIGURE 7.10 The least developed countries are the richest in children, 2004 "Figure 2.1. The Least Developed Countries Are the Richest In Children," in The State of the World's Children 2006, United Nations Children's Fund, 2005, http://www.unicef.org/sowc06/pdfs/sowc0506_eps_charts.pdf (accessed April 8, 2006). Data based on calculations from United Nations Population Division.countries in the world are home to the greatest number of children—49% of the total population of least developed countries was under eighteen years old in 2004; in developing countries children under eighteen made up 37% of the total population. (See Figure 7.10.)

Children are more vulnerable to the effects of poverty than any other demographic group, and because their numbers in poor countries are so high, they suffer disproportionately from the disease, hunger, abuse, and exploitation that so often go hand in hand with poverty. UNICEF reports that "more than one billion children suffer from one or more extreme forms of deprivation in adequate nutrition, safe drinking water, decent sanitation facilities, health-care services, shelter, education and information." As Figure 7.11 shows, 30.7% of children in developing countries have no access to a toilet, while 33.9% live in homes with more than five people per room. For 21.1%, there is access only to untreated, potentially hazardous, water sources. Furthermore, 13.1% have never been to school. Underdeveloped and developing countries overall have the highest rates of children not attending school, as shown in Figure 7.12. Whereas 96% of girls and 95% of boys in developed countries are enrolled in primary school, just 65% of girls and 71% of boys in underdeveloped ("least developed") countries are enrolled in primary school. Even fewer poor children are enrolled in secondary school: 26% of girls and 30% of boys in underdeveloped countries, versus 92% of girls and 91% of boys in developed countries.

FIGURE 7.11 Severe deprivation among children in the developing world, by different deprivations, 2003 "Figure 2.1. Severe Deprivation among Children in the Developing World, by Different Deprivations," in The State of the World's Children 2006, United Nations Children's Fund, 2005, http://www.unicef.org/sowc06/pdfs/figure2_1_2005.pdf (accessed April 8, 2006). Data from Gordon, David, et al., Child Poverty in the Developing World, The Policy Press, Bristol, UK, October 2003.

FIGURE 7.12 Children living in the poorest countries are most at risk of missing out on primary and secondary school, 2000–04 "Figure 2.2 Children Living in the Poorest Countries Are Most at Risk of Missing Out on Primary and Secondary School," in The State of the World's Children 2006, United Nations Children's Fund, 2005, http://www.unicef.org/sowc06/pdfs/sowc0506_eps_charts.pdf (accessed April 8, 2006). Data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS)

Table 7.8 lists each country's rank according to its under-five mortality rate, as well as each country's infant and under-five mortality rates, life expectancy, literacy and education rates, and gross national per capita income. In general, life expectancy at birth increases as gross national income per capita increases. Infant and under-five mortality rates improved overall between 1990 and 2004 in least developed, developing, and industrialized countries.

Table 7.9 shows the status of child protection in countries around the world. Western and Central African countries have the overall highest percentage of children involved in child labor (41% of both girls and boys). At 46%, South Asia has the highest rate of child marriage of any geographic region, followed closely by Western and Central Africa, at 45%.

Child poverty is not limited to low-income countries. In eleven out of the fifteen countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), child poverty increased from the period of the late 1980s–early 1990s through the late 1990s–early 2000s. In this group, Mexico had the highest rate of child poverty, rising from 24.7% in the earlier period to 27.7% in the later period. The United States had the second highest rate; even with a drop from 24.3% to 21.9%, the U.S. child poverty rate far exceeded the rate of all other OECD countries except Mexico. In the United Kingdom the drop from 18.5% to 15.4% was due in large part to the commitment

TABLE 7.8 Under-five mortality rank and other development indicators, by country, 1990–2004

TABLE 7.8
Under-five mortality rank and other development indicators, by country, 1990–2004
Countries and territories Under-5 mortality rank Under-5 mortality rate Infant mortality rate (under 1)a Total population (thousands) 2004 Annual number of births (thousands) 2004 Annual number of under-5 deaths (thousands) 2004 Gross national income per capita (US$)b 2004 Life expectancy at birth (years)c 2004 Total adult literacy rated 2000–2004g Net primary school enrolment/attendance (percent)e 1996–2004g Percent share of household Incomef 1993–2003g
1990 2004 1990 2004 Lowest 40% Highest 20%
Afghanistan 4 260 257 168 165 28,574 1,395 359    250m 46  53l
Albania 125 45 19 37 17 3,112 53 1  2,080 74 99  95 23 37
Algeria 79 69 40 54 35 32,358 671 27  2,280 71 70  94l 19 43
Andorra 159 7 6 67 1 0      k  89
Angola 2 260 260 154 154 15,490 749 195  1,030 41 67  58l
Antigua and Barbuda 143 12 11 81 2 0 10,000  —
Argentina 127 29 18 26 16 38,372 685 12  3,720 75 97  — 10 56
Armenia 90 60 32 52 29 3,026 34 1  1,120 72 99  97l 18 45
Australia 162 10 6 8 5 19,942 249 1 26,900 81  97 18 41
Austria 172 10 5 8 5 8,171 75 0 32,300 79  90 21 39
Azerbaijan 51 105 90 84 75 8,355 132 12    950 67 99  91l 19 45
Bahamas 140 29 13 24 10 319 6 0 14,920m 70  86
Bahrain 148 19 11 15 9 716 13 0 10,840m 75 88  86l
Bangladesh 58 149 77 100 56 139,215 3,738 288    440 63 41  79l 22 41
Barbados 143 16 12 14 10 269 3 0  9,270m 75 100 100
Belarus 148 17 11 13 9 9,811 91 1  2,120 68 100  94 21 39
Belgium 172 10 5 8 4 10,400 111 1 31,030 79 100 22 37
Belize 81 49 39 39 32 264 7 0  3,940 72 77  99
Benin 23 185 152 111 90 8,177 341 52    530 54 34  54l
Bhutan 56 166 80 107 67 2,116 64 5    760 63  —
Bolivia 62 125 69 89 54 9,009 265 18    960 64 87  78l 13 49
Bosnia and Herzegovina 131 22 15 18 13 3,909 37 1  2,040 74 95  86l 24 36
Botswana 41 58 116 45 84 1,769 46 5  4,340 35 79  84l 7 70
Brazil 88 60 34 50 32 183,913 3,728 127  3,090 71 88  95l 8 63
Brunei Darussalam 150 11 9 10 8 366 8 0 24,100m 77 93  —
Bulgaria 131 18 15 15 12 7,780 67 1  2,740 72 98  90 20 39
Burkina Faso 16 210 192 113 97 12,822 601 115    360 48 13  321 12 61
Burundi 17 190 190 114 114 7,282 330 63     90 44 59  47l 15 48
Cambodia 26 115 141 80 97 13,798 422 60    320 57 74  65l 18 48
Cameroon 25 139 149 85 87 16,038 562 84    800 46 68  75l 15 51
Canada 162 8 6 7 5 31,958 328 2 28,390 80 100 20 40
Cape Verde 86 60 36 45 27 495 15 1  1,770 71 76  99
Central African Republic 15 168 193 102 115 3,986 149 29    310 39 49  43l 7 65
Chad 12 203 200 117 117 9,448 456 91    260 44 26  391
Chile 152 21 8 17 8 16,124 249 2  4,910 78 96  85 10 62
China 93 49 31 38 26 1,307,989 17,372 539  1,290 72 91  99 14 50
Colombia 113 36 21 30 18 44,915 970 20  2,000 73 94  931 9 62
Comoros 61 120 70 88 52 777 28 2    530 64 56  31l
Congo 44 110 108 83 81 3,883 172 19    770 52 83  54
Congo, Democratic Republic of the 8 205 205 129 129 55,853 2,788 572    120 44 65  52l

TABLE 7.8 Under-five mortality rank and other development indicators, by country, 1990–2004 [CONTINUED]

TABLE 7.8
Under-five mortality rank and other development indicators, by country, 1990–2004 [CONTINUED]
Countries and territories Under-5 mortality rank Under-5 mortality rate Infant mortality rate (under 1)a Total population (thousands) 2004 Annual number of births (thousands) 2004 Annual number of under-5 deaths (thousands) 2004 Gross national income per capita (US$)b 2004 Life expectancy at birth (years)c 2004 Total adult literacy rated 2000–2004g Net primary school enrolment/attendance (percent)e 1996–2004g Percent share of household Incomef 1993–2003g
1990 2004 1990 2004 Lowest 40% Highest 20%
Cook Islands 113 32 21 26 18 18 0 0     —  —
Costa Rica 140 18 13 16 11 4,253 79 1  4,670 78 96  90 13 52
Côte d'Ivoire 14 157 194 103 117 17,872 661 128    770 46 48  58l 14 51
Croatia 159 12 7 11 6 4,540 41 0  6,590 75 98  89 21 40
Cuba 159 13 7 11 6 11,245 136 1  1,170m 78 100  93
Cyprus 172 12 5 10 5 826 10 0 17,580 79 97  96
Czech Republic 185 13 4 11 4 10,229 91 0  9,150 76  87 25 36
Denmark 172 9 5 8 4 5,414 63 0 40,650 77 100 23 36
Djibouti 31 163 126 122 101 779 27 3  1,030 53  36
Dominica 135 17 14 15 13 79 2 0  3,650  81
Dominican Republic 90 65 32 50 27 8,768 211 7  2,080 68 88  92l 14 53
Ecuador 104 57 26 43 23 13,040 296 8  2,180 75 91 100 11 58
Egypt 86 104 36 76 26 72,642 1,890 68  1,310 70 56  83l 21 44
El Salvador 98 60 28 47 24 6,762 166 5  2,350 71 80  90 10 57
Equatorial Guinea 9 170 204 103 122 492 21 4      j 43 84  62l
Eritrea 54 147 82 88 52 4,232 166 14    180 54  63l
Estonia 152 16 8 12 6 1,335 13 0  7,010 72 100  95 18 44
Ethiopia 20 204 166 131 110 75,600 3,064 509    110 48 42  31l 22 39
Fiji 120 31 20 25 16 841 19 0  2,690 68 93 100
Finland 185 7 4 6 3 5,235 55 0 32,790 79 100 24 37
France 172 9 5 7 4 60,257 744 4 30,090 80  99 20 40
Gabon 49 92 91 60 60 1,362 42 4  3,940 54  94l
Gambia 36 154 122 103 89 1,478 52 6    290 56  53l 14 53
Georgia 75 47 45 43 41 4,518 50 2  1,040 71  89 18 44
Germany 172 9 5 7 4 82,645 687 3 30,120 79  83 22 37
Ghana 42 122 112 75 68 21,664 679 76    380 57 54  61l 16 47
Greece 172 11 5 10 4 11,098 102 1 16,610 78 91  99 19 44
Grenada 113 37 21 30 18 102 2 0  3,760  84
Guatemala 75 82 45 60 33 12,295 433 19  2,130 68 69  78l 9 64
Guinea 22 240 155 145 101 9,202 383 59    460 54  57l 17 47
Guinea-Bissau 10 253 203 153 126 1,540 77 16    160 45  41l 14 53
Guyana 67 88 64 64 48 750 16 1    990 64  97l
Haiti 40 150 117 102 74 8,407 253 30    390 52 52  54l
Holy See 1     —  —
Honduras 78 59 41 44 31 7,048 206 8  1,030 68 80  87 9 59
Hungary 152 17 8 15 7 10,124 95 1  8,270 73 99  91 23 37
Iceland 192 7 3 6 2 292 4 0 38,620 81 100
India 52 123 85 84 62 1,087,124 26,000 2,210    620 64 61  77l 21 43
Indonesia 83 91 38 60 30 220,077 4,513 171  1,140 67 88  94l 20 43

TABLE 7.8 Under-five mortality rank and other development indicators, by country, 1990–2004 [CONTINUED]

TABLE 7.8
Under-five mortality rank and other development indicators, by country, 1990–2004 [CONTINUED]
Countries and territories Under-5 mortality rank Under-5 mortality rate Infant mortality rate (under 1)a Total population (thousands) 2004 Annual number of births (thousands) 2004 Annual number of under-5 deaths (thousands) 2004 Gross national income per capita (US$)b 2004 Life expectancy at birth (years)c 2004 Total adult literacy rated 2000–2004g Net primary school enrolment/attendance (percent)e 1996–2004g Percent share of household Incomef 1993–2003g
1990 2004 1990 2004 Lowest 40% Highest 20%
Iran (Islamic Republic of) 83 72 38 54 32 68,803 1,308 50  2,300 71 77  86 15 50
Iraq 33 50 125 40 102 28,057 972 122  2,170m 59  78l
Ireland 162 10 6 8 5 4,080 63 0 34,280 78  96 19 43
Israel 162 12 6 10 5 6,601 134 1 17,380 80 97  99 18 44
Italy 172 9 5 9 4 58,033 531 3 26,120 80  99 19 42
Jamaica 120 20 20 17 17 2,639 52 1  2,900 71 88  95 17 46
Japan 185 6 4 5 3 127,923 1,169 5 37,180 82 100 25 36
Jordan 101 40 27 33 23 5,561 150 4  2,140 72 90  99l 19 44
Kazakhstan 60 63 73 53 63 14,839 237 17  2,260 63 100  91l 20 40
Kenya 37 97 120 64 79 33,467 1,322 159    460 48 74  78l 16 49
Kiribati 66 88 65 65 49 97 2 0    970  —
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 71 55 55 42 42 22,384 349 19      h 63  —
Korea, Republic of 162 9 6 8 5 47,645 467 3 13,980 77 100 22 38
Kuwait 143 16 12 14 10 2,606 50 1 16,340m 77 83  83
Kyrgyzstan 64 80 68 68 58 5,204 116 8    400 67 99  89l 20 43
Lao People's Democratic Republic 53 163 83 120 65 5,792 204 17    390 55 69  62l 19 45
Latvia 143 18 12 14 10 2,318 21 0  5,460 72 100  86 20 41
Lebanon 93 37 31 32 27 3,540 66 2  4,980 72  97l
Lesotho 54 120 82 84 61 1,798 50 4    740 35 81  65l 6 67
Liberia 5 235 235 157 157 3,241 164 39    110 42 56  70
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 120 41 20 35 18 5,740 133 3  4,450 74 82  —
Liechtenstein 172 10 5 9 4 34 0 0      k  —
Lithuania 152 13 8 10 8 3,443 31 0  5,740 73 100  91 21 40
Luxembourg 162 10 6 7 5 459 6 0 56,230 79  90
Madagascar 35 168 123 103 76 18,113 704 87    300 56 71  76l 13 54
Malawi 19 241 175 146 110 12,608 550 96    170 40 64  76l 13 56
Malaysia 143 22 12 16 10 24,894 549 7  4,650 73 89  93 13 54
Maldives 74 111 46 79 35 321 10 0  2,510 67 96  92
Mali 7 250 219 140 121 13,124 647 142    360 48 19  39l 13 56
Malta 162 11 6 9 5 400 4 0 12,250 79 88  96
Marshall lslands 69 92 59 63 52 60 0 0  2,370  84
Mauritania 33 133 125 85 78 2,980 123 15    420 53 51  44l 17 46
Mauritius 131 23 15 21 14 1,233 20 0  4,640 72 84  97
Mexico 98 46 28 37 23 105,699 2,201 62  6,770 75 90  99 10 59
Micronesia (Federated States of) 110 31 23 26 19 110 3 0  1,990 68  —
Moldova, Republic of 98 40 28 30 23 4,218 43 1    710 68 96  98l 18 44
Monaco 172 9 5 7 4 35 0 0      k  —

TABLE 7.8 Under-five mortality rank and other development indicators, by country, 1990–2004 [CONTINUED]

TABLE 7.8
Under-five mortality rank and other development indicators, by country, 1990–2004 [CONTINUED]
Countries and territories Under-5 mortality rank Under-5 mortality rate Infant mortality rate (under 1)a Total population (thousands) 2004 Annual number of births (thousands) 2004 Annual number of under-5 deaths (thousands) 2004 Gross national income per capita (US$)b 2004 Life expectancy at birth (years)c 2004 Total adult literacy rated 2000–2004g Net primary school enrolment/attendance (percent)e 1996–2004g Percent share of household Incomef 1993–2003g
1990 2004 1990 2004 Lowest 40% Highest 20%
Mongolia 72 108 52 78 41 2,614 58 3    590 65 98  79l 16 51
Morocco 77 89 43 69 38 31,020 713 31  1,520 70 51  89l 17 47
Mozambique 23 235 152 158 104 19,424 769 117    250 42 46  60l 17 47
Myanmar 45 130 106 91 76 50,004 992 105    220m 61 90  80l
Namibia 68 86 63 60 47 2,009 56 4  2,370 47 85  78l  4 79
Nauru 95 30 25 13 0 0     —  81
Nepal 59 145 76 100 59 26,591 786 60    260 62 49  74l 19 45
Netherlands 162 9 6 7 5 16,226 190 1 31,700 79  99 21 39
New Zealand 162 11 6 8 5 3,989 55 0 20,310 79 100 18 44
Nicaragua 83 68 38 52 31 5,376 153 6    790 70 77  80l 15 49
Niger 3 320 259 191 152 13,499 734 190    230 45 14  30l 10 53
Nigeria 13 230 197 120 101 128,709 5,323 1,049    390 43 67  62l 13 56
Niue 1 0     —  99
Norway 185 9 4 7 4 4,598 55 0 52,030 80 100 24 37
Occupied Palestinian territory 107 40 24 34 22 3,587 136 3  1,110m 73 92  91
Oman 140 32 13 25 10 2,534 64 1  7,830m 74 74  72
Pakistan 47 130 101 100 80 154,794 4,729 478    600 63 49  56l 21 42
Palau 101 34 27 28 22 20 0 0  6,870  96
Panama 107 34 24 27 19 3,175 70 2  4,450 75 92 100  9 60
Papua New Guinea 48 101 93 74 68 5,772 176 16    580 56 57  74 12 57
Paraguay 107 41 24 33 21 6,017 175 4  1,170 71 92  89  9 61
Peru 97 80 29 60 24 27,562 627 18  2,360 70 88  96l 11 53
Philippines 88 62 34 41 26 81,617 2,026 69  1,170 71 93  88l 14 52
Poland 152 18 8 19 7 38,559 365 3  6,090 75  98 20 41
Portugal 172 14 5 11 4 10,441 112 1 14,350 78 100 17 46
Qatar 113 26 21 21 18 777 14 0 12,000m 73 89  94
Romania 120 31 20 27 17 21,790 213 4  2,920 72 97  89 20 41
Russian Federation 113 29 21 23 17 143,899 1,511 32  3,410 65 99  90 21 39
Rwanda 10 173 203 103 118 8,882 365 74    220 44 64  75l 23m 39m
Saint Kitts and Nevis 113 36 21 30 18 42 1 0  7,600  95
Saint Lucia 135 21 14 20 13 159 3 0  4,310 73 90  99
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 112 25 22 22 18 118 2 0  3,650 71  90
Samoa 95 50 30 40 25 184 5 0  1,860 71 99  98
San Marino 185 14 4 13 3 28 0 0      k  —
Sao Tome and Principe 38 118 118 75 75 153 5 1    370 63  78l