Library Index :: Welfare and Welfare Reform in the United States :: Comparing the New (TANF) with the Old (AFDC) - Public Opinion Polls, A Brief Background Of Afdc, Afdc-up, Federal Spending On Afdc And Tanf

Comparing the New (TANF) with the Old (AFDC) - Characteristics Of Afdc/tanf Recipients

Children make up the majority of AFDC/TANF recipients. The proportion of children receiving benefits remained relatively steady from 1980 to 1999. In 1980,

TABLE 7.7
Maximum combined Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and food benefits1 for single-parent family from one to six persons2 January 1, 2003

Family size
State 1 2 3 4 5 6
Wisconsin–Community Service (3) 767 877 976 1,068 1,184
Wisconsin–W2 Transitions (3) 735 845 944 1,036 1,153
1Food stamp calculations assume that the family does not receive an excess shelter deduction. In many states with low TANF benefits, combined benefits shown reflect the maximum food stamp allotment for the family size, but in some states the excess shelter deduction would increase food stamps (by up to $110 monthly–more in Alaska and Hawaii).
2Calculations assume a single-parent family with no earned income.
3Wisconsin has no one-person families in its regular W-2 (TANF) program. Pregnant women without children are ineligible and "child-only" recipients have been moved into special programs of kinship care and SSI caretaker supplements. The kinship care payment is $215 monthly per child; the SSI caretaker supplement program provides $250 monthly for the first eligible child and $150 for each additional child.
SOURCE: "Table 7-12. Maximum Combined TANF and Food Benefits for Single-Parent Family from One to Six Persons, January 1, 2003," in The Green Book, U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means, 2003 [Online] http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/greenbook2003/Section7.pdf [accessed January 28, 2004]

69.1 percent of AFDC recipients were children. Of the 5.1 million Americans who received TANF support in 2002, about 3.8 million (74.5 percent) were children. Meanwhile, the percentage of all children on AFDC/TANF fell from 11.5 percent in 1980 to 5.3 percent in 2002. (See Table 7.8.)

While one of the major criticisms of the AFDC program was that welfare mothers had many children in order to get additional benefits, the average AFDC family had only two children in 1980. Between 1980 and 2002 the number of children in the average AFDC/TANF family changed very little; in 2002 there were on average 1.9 children per family.

In 1999 most children receiving TANF benefits were children of the head of household in TANF families; 8 percent were grandchildren of the head of the household. In cases where only the child received TANF benefits, 63 percent lived with their parents and 23 percent with grandparents.

In 2001 African-American families were 39 percent of the TANF cases; white families, 30.1 percent; Hispanics, 26 percent; Asians, 2.1 percent; and Native Americans, 1.3 percent. This represents a decline in the percentage of white recipients (down from 38.9 percent in 1992), Asian recipients (down from 2.8 percent) and Native American recipients (down from 1.4 percent) and an increase in the percentage of African-American recipients (up from 37.2 percent) and Hispanic recipients (up from 17.8 percent). (See Table 7.10.)

The proportions of Asian or Native American children receiving benefits remained relatively stable from 1992 to 2001. During the same period, the percentage of all Hispanic child beneficiaries increased from 18.7 percent to 27.8 percent, and the proportion of African-American child beneficiaries

TABLE 7.8
Historical trends in Aid to Families with Dependent Children/Temporary Assistance for Needy Families enrollment, selected fiscal years, 1975–2002

Average monthly number (in thousands)
Fiscal year Families Recipients Children Total child population (under age 18)* % all children on AFDC/TANF
1975 3,357 11,094 7,952 67,164 11.8
1980 3,642 10,597 7,320 63,754 11.5
1985 3,692 10,813 7,165 62,623 11.4
1990 3,974 11,460 7,755 63,942 12.1
1991 4,374 12,592 8,513 65,069 13.1
1992 4,768 13,625 9,226 66,075 14.0
1993 4,981 14,143 9,560 66,963 14.3
1994 5,046 14,226 9,611 67,804 14.2
1995 4,879 13,659 9,280 68,438 13.6
1996 4,543 12,645 8,671 69,109 12.5
1997 3,937 10,935 7,301 69,603 10.5
1998 3,200 8,790 6,330 69,903 9.0
1999 2,674 7,188 5,319 70,199 7.6
2000 2,265 5,943 4,385 72,330 6.1
2001 2,116 5,420 4,055 72,616 5.6
2002 2,064 5,146 3,838 72,894 5.3
*Census Bureau estimates of the resident child population (under age 18) as of July 1 each year.
SOURCE: "Table 7-6. Historical Trends in AFDC/TANF Enrollments, Selected Fiscal Years, 1975–2002," in The Green Book, U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means, 2003 [Online] http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/greenbook2003/Section7.pdf [accessed January 28, 2004]

increased from 38.5 percent to 40.8 percent. The percentage of all white child beneficiaries dropped from 33.9 percent to 25.6 percent. (See Table 7.10.)

The majority of adults receiving TANF benefits between October 2000 and September 2001 had a high school education or less. Almost half (49 percent) had completed twelve years of schooling, and only 3.1 percent had education beyond high school. (See Table 7.11.)

The percentage of AFDC and TANF adults who were employed increased dramatically between 1990 and 2001, from 7 percent in 1990 to 26.7 percent in the period between October 2000 and September 2001.

AFDC recipients were likely to participate in one or more other programs. TANF recipients are also eligible for other types of assistance. Of the almost 4.6 million families on AFDC in 1996, 89.3 percent received food stamps. In 2001, 80.8 percent of TANF families received food stamps. Almost all families (99.6 percent) received Medicaid. TANF families received an average of $351.26 in cash assistance per month between October 2000 and September 2001. Family income from all other sources averaged $592.87 per month. (See Table 7.11). (For a more complete discussion of participation of TANF recipients in multiple programs, see Chapter 6.)

Although the largest expenditure for most families is for shelter, only about 20 percent of TANF families

TABLE 7.9
Families receiving Aid to Families with Dependent Children/Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, monthly average, fiscal years 1994–2002
[families in thousands]

State 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Percent change, 2002–1994
Alabama 50 46 42 35 23 20 19 18 18 −64.2
Alaska 13 12 12 12 10 9 7 6 6 −53.1
Arizona 72 70 63 55 40 34 34 33 40 −44.3
Arkansas 26 24 23 21 14 12 12 12 12 −53.8
California 909 920 896 816 707 624 498 469 462 −48.1
Colorado 42 39 35 30 21 14 11 11 12 −70.9
Connecticut 59 61 58 56 48 34 28 26 24 −60.0
Delaware 12 11 10 10 7 6 6 5 6 −52.2
District of Columbia 27 27 26 24 21 19 18 16 16 −40.2
Florida 247 231 210 171 108 82 67 59 59 −76.1
Georgia 142 139 130 106 75 62 53 51 54 −62.0
Hawaii 20 22 22 21 17 16 14 13 11 −45.6
Idaho 9 9 9 6 2 1 1 1 1 −83.9
Illinois 240 236 224 199 170 123 84 62 48 −80.0
Indiana 74 66 53 45 40 37 36 41 49 −33.2
Iowa 40 37 33 29 25 22 20 20 20 −49.0
Kansas 30 28 25 20 14 13 13 13 14 −53.5
Kentucky 80 75 72 65 53 43 39 36 35 −56.3
Louisiana 87 80 71 57 48 39 28 25 24 −72.7
Maine 23 22 21 19 15 14 11 10 10 −57.6
Maryland 80 80 74 59 47 35 29 28 27 −66.2
Massachusetts 112 101 88 78 67 55 44 43 47 −57.7
Michigan 224 202 178 152 124 95 74 71 74 −66.8
Minnesota 63 61 58 53 48 43 39 39 36 −43.0
Mississippi 57 53 48 39 24 17 15 16 18 −69.0
Missouri 92 89 83 72 60 51 47 46 45 −51.1
Montana 12 12 11 9 6 5 5 5 6 −51.3
Nebraska 16 15 15 14 13 11 10 10 10 −35.2
Nevada 14 16 15 12 10 8 6 7 11 −22.5
New Hampshire 12 11 10 8 7 6 6 6 6 −47.0
New Jersey 122 119 106 95 77 62 52 45 42 −65.7
New Mexico 34 34 34 27 22 26 24 19 17 −49.4
New York 455 457 432 384 366 326 259 227 170 −62.5
North Carolina 131 126 113 99 78 59 46 44 43 −67.3
North Dakota 6 5 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 −45.8
Ohio 250 228 207 186 140 109 98 85 84 −66.4
Oklahoma 47 45 39 30 25 20 14 14 15 −68.5
Oregon 42 39 33 24 18 17 17 16 18 −57.5
Pennsylvania 210 205 190 164 135 106 90 83 81 −61.7
Puerto Rico 59 55 51 48 42 36 32 26 23 −60.2
Rhode Island 23 22 21 20 19 18 16 15 14 −36.6
South Carolina 52 49 46 34.2 25 18 18 17 21 −60.1
South Dakota 7 6 6 5 4 3 3 3 3 −58.0
Tennessee 111 104 99 70 57 58 56 59 63 −43.1
Texas 284 273 255 209 145 114 128 131 130 −54.2
Utah 18 17 15 12 11 10 8 8 8 −56.2
Vermont 10 10 9 8 7 7 6 6 5 −48.5
Virginia 75 72 65 54 43 37 32 29 30 −59.8
Washington 103 102 99 93 79 64 57 54 54 −47.4
West Virginia 41 38 37 34 20 11 12 15 16 −60.9
Wisconsin 77 72 60 39 13 19 17 18 19 −75.4
Wyoming 5.7 5.2 4.7 2.8 1.2 1 1 1 1 −91.2
Guam 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.1 3 3 3 3 −63.2
Virgin Islands 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.1 1 1 1 1 −45.5
Total 5,046 4,879 4,543 3,937 3,200 2,674 2,265 2,116 2,065 −59.1
SOURCE: "Table 7-7. AFDC/TANF Families, Monthly Average, Fiscal Years 1994–2002," in The Green Book, U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means, 2003 [Online] http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/greenbook2003/Section7.pdf [accessed January 28, 2004]

received subsidized housing assistance in 2001. The availability of public housing and rent subsidies varies significantly by state/territory, with Guam, Illinois, Iowa, Utah, the Virgin Islands, and Virginia providing no housing assistance, and Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Massachusetts, Montana, North Dakota, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, and South Dakota providing assistance to more than 30 percent of their TANF families (See Table 7.12.) See Chapter 8 for more information on federal housing.

User Comments Add a comment…