Library Index » Social Issues & Debate Topics » Child Abuse—A Problem of Definition - What Is Abuse?, Capta Defines Four Main Types Of Child Maltreatment, A Description Of Maltreated Children

Child Abuse—A Problem of Definition - A Description Of Maltreated Children

parents neglect medical parent

Perhaps better than a definition of child abuse is a description of the characteristics likely to be exhibited by abused and/or neglected children. The Department of Health and Human Services indicates that, in general, abused or neglected children are likely to have at least several of the following characteristics:

  • They appear to be different from other children in physical or emotional makeup, or their parents inappropriately describe them as being "different" or "bad."
  • They seem unduly afraid of their parents.
  • They may often bear welts, bruises, untreated sores, or other skin injuries.
  • Their injuries seem to be inadequately treated.
  • They show evidence of overall poor care.
  • They are given inappropriate food, drink, or medication.
  • They exhibit behavioral extremes—for example, crying often or crying very little and showing no real expectation of being comforted; being excessively fearful or seemingly fearless of adult authority; being unusually aggressive and destructive or extremely passive and withdrawn.
  • Some are wary of physical contact, especially when initiated by an adult. They become fearful when an adult approaches another child, particularly one who is crying. Others are inappropriately hungry for affection, yet may have difficulty relating to children and adults. Based on their past experiences, these children cannot risk getting too close to others.
  • They may exhibit a sudden change in behavior—for example, displaying regressive behavior, such as pants wetting, thumb sucking, frequent whining, becoming disruptive, or becoming uncommonly shy and passive.
  • They take over the role of the parent, being protective or otherwise attempting to take care of the parent's needs.
  • They have learning problems that cannot be diagnosed. If a child's academic intelligence quotient (IQ) is average or better and medical tests indicate no abnormalities, but the child still cannot meet normal expectations, the answer may well be problems in the home—one of which may be abuse or neglect. Particular attention should be given to the child whose attention wanders and who easily becomes self-absorbed.
  • They are habitually truant or late for school. Frequent or prolonged absences sometimes result when a parent keeps an injured child at home until the evidence of abuse disappears. In other cases, truancy indicates lack of parental concern or inability to regulate the child's schedule.
  • In some cases, they arrive at school too early and remain after classes have ended, rather than go home.
  • They are always tired and often sleep in class.
  • They are inappropriately dressed for the weather. Children who never have coats or shoes in cold weather are receiving less than minimal care. Those who regularly wear long sleeves or high necklines on hot days, however, may be dressed to hide bruises, burns, or other marks of abuse.

Many of the psychological symptoms of abuse can be contradictory. One child may be excessively aggressive, while another may be too compliant. One child may be extremely independent, while another may exhibit a clinging behavior. A child may be overly mature, attending to the emotional needs of a parent who is incapable of meeting his or her own needs. These different behaviors are possible symptoms of abuse. No one behavior on the part of a child, however, is conclusive evidence of abuse.

Victims of Physical Abuse

Victims of physical abuse often display bruises, welts, contusions, cuts, burns, fractures, lacerations, strap marks, swellings, and/or lost teeth. While internal injuries are seldom detectable without a hospital examination, anyone in close contact with children should be alert to multiple injuries, a history of repeated injuries, new injuries added to old ones, and untreated injuries, especially in very young children. Older children may attribute an injury to an improbable cause, lying for fear of parental retaliation. Younger children, however, may be unaware that a severe beating is unacceptable and may admit to having been abused.

Physically abused children frequently have behavior problems. Especially among adolescents, chronic and unexplainable misbehavior should be investigated as possible evidence of abuse. Some children come to expect abusive behavior as the only kind of attention they can receive and so act in a way that invites abuse. Others break the law deliberately in order to come under the jurisdiction of the courts to obtain protection from their parents. According to "Recognizing Signs of Child Abuse" (The Nemours Foundation, [accessed December 27, 2004]), children who have been abused may display a wide array of behavioral problems including being aggressive or disruptive; displaying intense anger or rage; being self-abusive or self-destructive; feeling suicidal or depressed; using drugs or alcohol; fearing certain adults; and avoiding being at home.

Parents who inflict physical abuse generally provide necessities, such as adequate food and clean clothes. Nevertheless, they get angry quickly, have unrealistic expectations of their children, and are overly critical and rejecting of their children. "Parents who abuse their children may avoid other parents in the neighborhood, may not participate in school activities, and may be uncomfortable talking about their children's injuries or behavioral problems," according to the Nemours Foundation. While many abusive parents have been mistreated as children themselves and are following a learned behavior, an increasing number who physically abuse their own children do so under the influence of alcohol and drugs.

Victims of Physical Neglect

Physically neglected children are often hungry. They may go without breakfast and have neither food nor money for lunch. Some take the lunch money or food of other children and hoard whatever they obtain. They show signs of malnutrition: paleness, low weight relative to height, lack of body tone, fatigue, inability to participate in physical activities, and lack of normal strength and endurance.

These children are usually irritable. They show evidence of inadequate home management and are unclean and unkempt. Their clothes are often torn and dirty. They may lack proper clothing for different weather conditions, and their school attendance may be irregular. In addition, these children may frequently be ill and may exhibit a generally repressed personality, inattentiveness, and withdrawal. They are in obvious need of medical attention for such correctable conditions as poor eyesight, poor dental care, and lack of immunizations.

A child who suffers physical neglect also generally lacks parental supervision at home. The child, for example, may frequently return from school to an empty house. While the need for adult supervision is, of course, relative to both the situation and the maturity of the child, it is generally held that a child younger than twelve should always be supervised by an adult or at least have immediate access to a concerned adult when necessary.

Parents of neglected children are either unable or unwilling to provide appropriate care. Some neglectful parents are mentally deficient. Most lack knowledge of parenting skills and tend to be discouraged, depressed, and frustrated with their role as parents. Alcohol or drug abuse may also be involved.

Physical neglect can be a result of poverty and/or ignorance and may not be intentional. According to the National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information (Acts of Omission: An Overview of Child Neglect, April 2001), if poor parents fail to feed their children adequately, they would be charged with neglect only if they know of food assistance programs but have failed to use them.

Victims of Emotional Abuse and Neglect

Emotional abuse and neglect are as serious as physical abuse and neglect, although this condition is far more difficult to describe or identify. Emotional maltreatment often involves a parent's lack of love or failure to give direction and encouragement. The parent may either demand far too much from the child in the area of academic, social, or athletic activity or withhold physical or verbal contact, indicating no concern for the child's successes and failures and giving no guidance or praise.

Parents who commit emotional abuse and neglect are often unable to accept their children as fallible human beings. The effects of such abuse can often be far more serious and lasting than those of physical abuse and neglect. Emotionally abused children are often extremely aggressive, disruptive, and demanding in an attempt to gain attention and love. They are rarely able to achieve the success in school that tests indicate they can achieve.

Emotional maltreatment can be hard to determine. Is the child's abnormal behavior the result of maltreatment on the part of the parents, or is it a result of inborn or internal factors? Stuart N. Hart, Marla R. Brassard, Nelson J. Binggeli, and Howard A. Davidson ("Psychological Maltreatment," The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 2002) have listed problems associated with emotional abuse and neglect, including poor appetite, lying, stealing, enuresis (bed-wetting), encopresis (passing of feces in unacceptable places after bowel control has been achieved), low self-esteem, low emotional responsiveness, failure to thrive, inability to be independent, withdrawal, suicide, and homicide.

Victims of Medical Neglect and Abuse

Medical neglect refers to the parents' failure to provide medical treatment for their children, including immunizations, prescribed medications, recommended surgery, and other intervention in cases of serious disease or injury. Some situations involve a parent's inability to care for a child or lack of access to health care. Other situations involve a parent's refusal to seek professional medical care, particularly because of a belief in spiritual healing.

Thorny legal issues have been raised by cases in which parents' freedom of religion clashes with the recommendations of medical professionals. Medical abuse may also involve the Munchausen syndrome by proxy, in which psychologically disturbed parents create illnesses or injuries in children in order to gain sympathy for themselves.

RELIGIOUS BELIEFS. Religious beliefs sometimes prevent children from getting needed medical care. For example, Christian Scientists believe that God heals the sick and that prayer and perfect faith are the proper responses to illness. Other religions, most notably Jehovah's Witnesses, forbid blood transfusions. Religious exemption laws make it difficult to prosecute parents who do not seek treatment for a sick child because their religion forbids it, although courts generally order the emergency treatment of the children.

Rita Swan, a former Christian Scientist who lost her sixteen-month-old child to untreated meningitis, is the president of Children's Healthcare Is a Legal Duty, Inc. (CHILD, Inc.), an organization that seeks to protect children from abusive cultural and religious practices, especially religion-based medical neglect. CHILD, Inc., reported that as of September 2004, thirty-nine states had religious exemptions from child abuse and neglect charges in the civil code, and thirty-one states had a religious defense to criminal charges. All states except Mississippi and West Virginia had religious exemptions from immunizations.

According to CHILD, Inc., Sec. 113 (42 U.S.C. 5106i) of the CAPTA Amendments of 1996 allows parents to withhold medical care from their children based on religious beliefs. Section 113 states:

Nothing in this Act shall be construed:

  1. as establishing a Federal requirement that a parent or legal guardian provide a child any medical service or treatment against the religious beliefs of the parent or legal guardian; and
  2. to require that a State find, or to prohibit a State from finding, abuse or neglect in cases in which a parent or legal guardian relies solely or partially upon spiritual means rather than medical treatment, in accordance with the religious beliefs of the parent or legal guardian.

MUNCHAUSEN SYNDROME BY PROXY. Munchausen syndrome is a psychiatric disorder in which patients fake illness or make themselves sick in order to get medical attention. In 1977 British physician Roy Meadow wrote a paper describing a condition he called Munchausen syndrome by proxy (MSBP) in which parents, usually mothers, call attention to themselves by inducing illnesses in their children or by hurting them ("Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: The Hinterland of Child Abuse," The Lancet, vol. 310, issue 8033). As a result of Meadow's article, authorities have concluded that some incidents of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), or the unexplained death of an infant, are murders attributable to parents, especially mothers, suffering from MSBP. Meadow became an expert witness for prosecutors and child protective services. As a result of his testimony, many parents lost their children to the state, had their parental rights terminated, or were charged with murder.

In MSBP situations, children are usually subjected to endless and often painful diagnostic tests, medications, and even surgery. The abuse is most often perpetrated against infants and toddlers before they can talk. Some older children who have been abused in this way do not reveal the deception, however, because they fear they will be abandoned by their parents if they are no longer sick. Others come to believe that they must truly be ill. According to Dr. Guy E. Brannon in "Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy" ([accessed January 6, 2005]), in about 10% of cases, MSBP has led to children's deaths.

Dr. Brannon reported that about six hundred cases of MSBP occur each year. He also noted that mothers are the perpetrators in 95% of the cases. Although there are no specific numbers, some experts believe that many of these mothers themselves have been abused as children. A mother with MSBP may think that by devoting her life to "helping" her sick child, she could be a nurturing parent, unlike her own abusive mother. She not only gets the attention that she craves but also the sympathy of those involved in her child's care.

In June 2000 David E. Hall et al. reported the diagnosis of MSBP in twenty-three out of forty-one suspected cases at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite, Atlanta, Georgia ("Evaluation of Covert Video Surveillance in the Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: Lessons from 41 Cases," Pediatrics, vol. 105, no. 6). For four years the researchers, after notifying law enforcement, monitored the children through hidden video cameras to determine the reasons for their inexplicable illnesses. The video surveillance showed the mothers abusing their children, from suffocation to injection with chemicals. Critics charged that the families' right to privacy had been invaded, but the researchers argued that abused children cannot speak up for themselves and need others to protect them.

FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF MUNCHAUSEN SYNDROME BY PROXY. In 2003 a British high court overturned the conviction of three mothers who had been found guilty of murdering their children based on Meadow's expert testimony. In one case, Meadow testified that the chances of two SIDS deaths in a family were one in seventy-three million. In another case, a jury convicted a mother of murder based on the pediatrician's sole testimony that three SIDS must be murder. Meadow based his testimony on his own theory, Meadow's law, which states that in a single family "one sudden infant death is a tragedy, two is suspicious, and three is murder until proved otherwise." Since then, Meadow's theories have been proven wrong. It was also discovered that Meadow could not produce any peer-reviewed research that would have supported his MSBP findings in 1977. Critics say that Meadow's discovery of the new illness resulted from just two of his cases and that he had not produced any records of his research on these cases. In 2004 British authorities continued to review child abuse cases that used Meadow's expert testimony. The British Medical Council also began an investigation of Meadow.

Physicians and child abuse experts are more cautious in labeling parents who harm their children as suffering from MSBP. Despite the controversies concerning MSBP, many physicians believe that there is such a condition, although it is said to be rare. In 2004 the British Medical Journal reported that just a minority of parents who intentionally hurt their children have shown Munchausen syndrome characteristics (Alan W. Craft and David M. B. Hall, "Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy and Sudden Infant Death," vol. 328, May 29, 2004). According to the authors, because "there is no single psychological profile in Munchausen syndrome by proxy," pediatricians replaced the term with Fabricated and/or Induced Illness in Children (FII). They noted, however, that research has shown that some cases of SIDS were later shown to be FII. They added that the occurrence of more than one infant death in a family is more likely to be due to homicide or inherited conditions.

Child Abuse—A Problem of Definition - A Family At Risk For Maltreatment [next] [back] Child Abuse—A Problem of Definition - Capta Defines Four Main Types Of Child Maltreatment

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

over 10 years ago

I am not sure if this is the correct department to submit this concern. My husband and I found out that a doctor located in Winchester, Indiana just began prescribing medication to his 9 year old son. This doctor did this with out consulting all the environments; i.e. school, after school and paternal family. And when my husband spoke to the mother regarding how the son did not need medication merely her attention to assist him with homework, the mother's response, which we recorded was "Obviously this isn't a good time for me to help with the homework.".

While my husbands ex-wife has physical custody of both children however they do share "joint custody". We have had to file contempt charges against the ex wife in which the judge did rule in my husband's favor in regards to her following the visitation guidelines as decreed in their divorce in Indiana.

The same state guidelines indicate that my husband has access to his childrens medical needs and be made a part of the process however this is not occuring. My husband and I are very involved with his children's education and other aspects of their life, but we are excluded from the medical part. This particular doctor does not contact him nor includes the other environments regarding testing, appointments, and adding new medications that he and I as well as other family members and the childrens' school teachers disagree with and are not made aware of by the mother and not just with his son but with the daughter also. We had sent the AMA concerns regarding the same doctor almost 2 years for the daughter.

Again, the concern is that on Thursday (3-8-2007), my husband's son saw the doctor and the mother requested medication and this doctor prescribed it. The ex wife informed us the night before around 9pm however she is fully aware that my husband needs at least 24-48 hours notice to give to his supervisor, since this is not the first time both the ex-wife and doctor have purposely excluded the father. The ex wife has medicaid and just recently re-obtained it. Why she had lost it for 1-2 months we do not know. During that time, the same doctor prescribed both Stratera and Risperdol (the doctor said to help her (the daughter) to sleep and possibly anger, however the mother knows how to "push" certain buttons with the daughter). At the same time the mother did not obtain the daughters seizure medication for a month. (She stated Riley Hospital was sending it via mail)

Two years ago this same doctor had promised us results of the daughters tests and we have yet to see the results.

Yes we gave her all the contact information she needed as well as our office fax number. We both feel noone is hearing our concerns, we disagree with the prescription and really the daughters prescriptions except for the Straterra for our daughters' seizures.

The mother claims that both the children are "explosive" and unruly. No they are not. We are with them 3 days a week. (We have had this routine for nearly five years) The children are always sick, going to the doctor or something "chaotic". We talk with their teachers, their friends while the mother neglects their educational and emotional needs.

My husband describes this doctors responses, as a woman who view's him as "just an ex husband with no rights." So our concerns are mainly that this doctor is just prescribing medications based on the ex-wifes input, and not all environments nor testing and continuously evaluating the need for medications. The fact that the doctor is completely disregarding

my husbands legal right as a joint custodial father is a violation of ethics and morals. We also question why the mother does not use a local doctor and has to travel out of town for this doctor.

If you cannot help us, can you point us in the right direction ?

I have listed our contact information.

Ted & Juliet B. Hamilton

(765)-939-2769 (Home# after 5pm)

(765)966-0502 ext 238 (Between 8am-4:30pm)

(765)966-0502 ext 237

[email protected]

[email protected]