Genetics and the Environment - Genetic And Environmental Influenceson Intelligence

twins iqs siblings parent

The role of genetics in determining a person's intelligence is a controversial subject. Few would deny that genes play some role, but many are uncomfortable with the idea that genes determine intelligence. For if intelligence is a genetic trait the implication is that some people are born to be smart, others are not, and education and upbringing cannot change it. The results of scores of studies and contentious debate in the scientific community have produced little consensus about the relationship between genetics and intelligence. At least part of the problem stems from the fact that "intelligence" is defined differently by different people.

Although this issue has been argued since the 1870s—when Francis Galton proposed his controversial and arguably racist notions about the heritability of intelligence—the debate was reignited during the 1990s when Richard Herrnstein (1930–94) and Charles Murray (1943–) published The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (New York: Touchstone Books, 1996). Herrnstein and Murray expressed their beliefs that between 40% and 80% of intelligence is determined by genetics and that it is intelligence levels, not environmental circumstances, poverty, or lack of education, that are at the root of many of our social problems. Critics argued that Herrnstein and Murray not only manipulated and misinterpreted data to support their contention that intelligence levels differ among ethnic groups, but also reintroduced outdated and harmful racial stereotypes. Many observers did agree with Herrnstein and Murray's premises that intellect is spread unevenly among individuals and population subgroups, that innate intelligence is distributed through the entire population on a "bell curve," with most people near to the average and fewer at the high and low ends, and even that the distribution varies by race and ethnicity. But few have been willing to accept the idea that intelligence is entirely genetically encoded, permanently fixed, and unresponsive to environmental influences.

One traditional measure of intelligence is a standardized intelligence quotient (IQ) test, which measures an individual's ability to reason and solve problems. Nearly all studies about the link between intelligence and genetics rely on results obtained from IQ tests, which generally provide an overall score along with measures of verbal ability and performance ability. Although there are several versions of IQ tests available, test takers generally perform comparably on all of them, presumably indicating that they all measure comparable aspects of cognitive ability. Critics of IQ tests as measures of intelligence contend that they do not measure all abilities in the complex realm of intelligence. They observe that the tests measure one small segment of the diverse abilities that comprise intelligence, evaluate only analytic abilities, fail to assess creative or practical abilities, and measure only a small sample of the skills that define the domain of intelligent human behavior.

Despite concern about whether IQ tests fully measure intelligence, nearly all scientific study of the contributions of genetics and environment to intelligence have focused on measuring IQ and examining individuals who differ in their familial relationships. For example, if genetics plays the predominant role in IQ, then identical twins should have IQs that compare more closely than the IQs of fraternal twins, and siblings' IQs should correlate more highly than those of cousins. In "Genetics of Childhood Disorders, II: Genetics and Intelligence" (Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 38, no. 5, May 1999), Alan Kaufman observed that scientists who argue in favor of genetic determination of IQ cite these data to support their assertion that:

  • Identical (monozygotic) twins' IQs are more similar than those of fraternal (dizygotic) twins.
  • IQs of siblings correlate more highly than IQs of half-siblings, which, in turn, correlate higher than IQs of cousins.
  • IQ correlations between a biological parent and child living together are higher than those between an adoptive parent and child living together.

Kaufman asserted that the following results support scientists who believe that environment more strongly determines IQ:

  • IQs of fraternal twins correlate more highly than IQs of siblings of different ages despite the same degree of genetic similarity.
  • Unrelated siblings reared together, such as biological and adopted children, have IQs that are more similar than biological siblings reared apart.
  • Correlations between IQs of an adoptive parent and a child living together are similar to correlations of a biological parent and a child living apart.
  • Siblings reared together have IQs that are more similar than siblings reared apart, and the same finding holds for parents and children, when they live together or apart.

The preponderance of evidence from twin, family, and adoption studies supports increasing heritability of intelligence over time, ranging from 20% in infancy to 60% in adulthood, along with environmental factors estimated to contribute about 30%. Kaufman suggested that heredity is important in determining a person's IQ, but environment is also crucial. Based on twin studies, the heritability percentage for IQ is approximately fifty, which is comparable with the heritability value for body weight. Kaufman believed that the genetic contribution to weight and intelligence are comparable. He observes that many overweight people have a genetic predisposition for a large frame and a metabolism that promotes weight gain, while naturally thin people have the opposite genetic predisposition. Nonetheless, for most people environmental factors such as diet and exercise have a substantial impact on weight. Similarly, genetics and environment interact to determine IQ, and people with genetic, familial relationships such as parents and siblings frequently share common environments.

In "Virtual Twins: New Findings on Within-Family Environmental Influences on Intelligence" (Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 92, no. 3, September 2000), psychologist Nancy Segal examined "virtual twins"—genetically unrelated siblings (typically adopted) of the same age who were reared together from early infancy—to assess environmental influences on intelligence. The results of this study reveal that the IQ correlation of virtual twins fell considerably below correlations reported for identical twins, fraternal twins, and full siblings. Segal interpreted these results as a demonstration of the modest effects of environment on intellectual development and as supporting a predominantly genetic role in determining intelligence.

Robert Plomin detailed similar findings from adoption studies in "Genetics of Childhood Disorders, III: Genetics and Intelligence" (Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 38, no. 6, June 1999). He observed that adoption studies have a substantial estimated heritability, finding that identical twins reared apart are almost as similar for measures of intelligence as identical twins reared together. Plomin also looked at 245 children adopted in the first month of life from the Colorado Adoption Project to see if there is more of a parent-offspring or an adoptive parent–adopted children correlation of IQ scores. He found significant correlations between biological mothers and their adopted-away children and almost no parent-offspring correlations for adoptive parents and their adopted children, suggesting that family environment shared by parents and offspring does not contribute as strongly as genetic influences to parent-offspring resemblance for selected measures of intelligence.

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

almost 7 years ago

In as much as I appreciate the role of genes in the cell developement of the body I do not see the link between intelligence and genes. if genes do define or rather the determinant of intelligence in ahuman being why does intelligence tend to differ the more a person acquires more knowledge. In my opinion it should not be changed unless we are saying heredity tend to change as a person grow up. I personally view intelligence as a software and it is different from the hardware which is the body.

Vote down Vote up

over 5 years ago

Intelligence, learning from experience, and
Consciousness-spirituality are brainchildren, and the brain is a progeny of mono-cells communities evolution:

Universe-Energy-Mass-Life Compilation

C. Know Thyself. Life Is Simpler Than We Are Told Including Origin-Nature Of Brain-Consciousness-“Spirituality"***

The origin-reason and the purpose-fate of life are mechanistic, ethically and practically valueless. Life is the cheapest commodity on Earth.
As Life is just another mass format, due to the oneness of the universe it is commonsensical that natural selection is ubiquitous for ALL mass formats and that life, self-replication, is its extension. And it is commonsensical, too, that evolutions, broken symmetry scenarios, are ubiquitous in all processes in all disciplines and that these evolutions are the “quantum mechanics" of the processes.

Human life is just one of many nature’s routes for the natural survival of RNAs, the base primal Earth organisms.

Life’s evolution, self-replication:

Genes (organisms) to genomes (organisms) to mono-cellular to multicellular organisms:

Individual mono-cells to cooperative mono-cells communities, “cultures".
Mono-cells cultures evolve their communication, neural systems, then further evolving nerved multicellular organisms.

Human life is just one of many nature’s routes for the natural survival of RNAs, the base Earth organism.
It is up to humans themselves to elect the purpose and format of their life as individuals and as group-members.

Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)
***המקור והמהות של "רוחניויות", כולן וירטואליות.
הרוחניויות נובעות מהמאמינים, לסיפוק ולשימוש שלהם.

Vote down Vote up

about 6 years ago

On Bigger Human Brain, Horse And Wagon

Change during human evolution could have led to bigger brains.
New Genes, New Brain

On Culture And Genetics, Horses And Wagon
If you saw it once, you saw it a million times: it’s the horses pulling, not the wagon pushing !

Enough with the AAAS trade-union mandated science peer-review ignorance. It’s culture that modifies genetics, not genetics that modifies culture.

Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)

Vote down Vote up

over 6 years ago

Human Intelligence Is Highly Heritable And Polygenic ?
Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic.

No kidding!

So What else is new?!

It’s culture, reactions to circumstances, that drives genetic changes. NOT vice versa.

Reaction(s) to circumstances, modified state or behavior, that enhance-increase constrained energy in animate OR inanimate mass format, are retained. This is what evolution is all about. This is what natural selection is. It is postponement of the conversion of mass to energy, to the energy that keeps fueling the universe expansion. The expansion that will be overcome by gravity when most mass is reconverted to the energy that moves on the galaxies clusters. The expansion will then be replaced with gravitational empansion back to singularity…

The RNAs, Earth’s primal organisms, retain-constrain evolutionary energy as long as possible. This is what alternative splicing is about, this is what genetic inheritance is all about…

Dov Henis
(comments from 22nd century)

The deceased “the-scientist community forum" posted tens of articles on this general subject…
See also